Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
VANBIERVLIET, G., M. STRIJKER, M. ARVANITAKIS, A. AELVOET, U. ARNELO et. al.Basic information
Original name
Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
Authors
VANBIERVLIET, G. (guarantor), M. STRIJKER, M. ARVANITAKIS, A. AELVOET, U. ARNELO, T. BEYNA, O. BUSCH, P. H. DEPREZ, Lumír KUNOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), A. LARGHI, G. MANES, A. MOSS, B. NAPOLEON, M. NAYAR, E. PEREZ-CUADRADO-ROBLES, S. SEEWALD, M. BARTHET and J. E. VAN HOOFT
Edition
Endoscopy, STUTTGART, GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG, 2021, 0013-726X
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30212 Surgery
Country of publisher
Germany
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 9.776
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121429
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000629334400001
Keywords in English
ampullary tumors; endoscopic management
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 17/5/2022 09:00, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Main Recommendations 1 ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence). Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20-30mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e.g. diverticulum, size >4cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of >20mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6 ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7 ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8 ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.