Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1763596,
author = {Veszprémi, Nóra},
article_number = {Léto 2021},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0067237821000102},
keywords = {landscape; Hungary; Czechoslovakia; revisionism; trianon; mental maps; memory sudies; memory politics;picturesque},
language = {eng},
issn = {0067-2378},
journal = {Austrian History Yearbook},
title = {Whose Landscape Is It? Remapping Memory and History in Interwar Central Europe},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/austrian-history-yearbook/article/whose-landscape-is-it-remapping-memory-and-history-in-interwar-central-europe/CFB012F74D8E122E9E2B89BBFEAD1627},
volume = {52},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1763596
AU - Veszprémi, Nóra
PY - 2021
TI - Whose Landscape Is It? Remapping Memory and History in Interwar Central Europe
JF - Austrian History Yearbook
VL - 52
IS - Léto 2021
SP - 227-252
EP - 227-252
PB - Cambridge university press
SN - 00672378
KW - landscape
KW - Hungary
KW - Czechoslovakia
KW - revisionism
KW - trianon
KW - mental maps
KW - memory sudies
KW - memory politics;picturesque
UR - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/austrian-history-yearbook/article/whose-landscape-is-it-remapping-memory-and-history-in-interwar-central-europe/CFB012F74D8E122E9E2B89BBFEAD1627
N2 - After the collapse of the Habsburg Empire and the sanctioning of new national borders in 1920, the successor states faced the controversial task of reconceptualizing the idea of national territory. Images of historically significant landscapes played a crucial role in this process. Employing the concept of mental maps, this article explores how such images shaped the connections between place, memory, and landscape in Hungary and Czechoslovakia. Hungarian revisionist publications demonstrate how Hungarian nationalists visualized the organic integrity of “Greater Hungary,” while also implicitly adapting historical memory to the new geopolitical situation. As a counterpoint, images of the Váh region produced in interwar Czechoslovakia reveal how an opposing political agenda gave rise to a different imagery, while drawing on shared cultural traditions from the imperial past. Finally, the case study of Dévény/Devín/Theben shows how the idea of being positioned “between East and West” lived on in overlapping but politically opposed mental maps in the interwar period. By examining the cracks and continuities in the picturesque landscape tradition after 1918, the article offers new insight into the similarities and differences of nation-building processes from the perspective of visual culture.
ER -
VESZPRÉMI, Nóra. Whose Landscape Is It? Remapping Memory and History in Interwar Central Europe. \textit{Austrian History Yearbook}. Cambridge university press, roč.~52, Léto 2021, s.~227-252. ISSN~0067-2378. doi:10.1017/S0067237821000102. 2021.
|
