J 2017

Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations

OHMANN, C., R. BANZI, S. CANHAM, S. BATTAGLIA, M. MATEI et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations

Authors

OHMANN, C., R. BANZI, S. CANHAM, S. BATTAGLIA, M. MATEI, C. ARIYO, L. BECNEL, B. BIERER, S. BOWERS, L. CLIVIO, M. DIAS, C. DRUML, H. FAURE, M. FENNER, J. GALVEZ, D. GHERSI, C. GLUUD, T. GROVES, P. HOUSTON, G. KARAM, D. KALRA, R. L. KNOWLES, K. KRLEZA-JERIC, C. KUBIAK, W. KUCHINKE, R. KUSH, A. LUKKARINEN, P. S. MARQUES, A. NEWBIGGING, J. O CALLAGHAN, P. RAVAUD, I. SCHLUNDER, D. SHANAHAN, H. SITTER, D. SPALDING, C. TUDUR-SMITH, P. VAN REUSEL, E. B. VAN VEEN, G. R. VISSER, J. WILSON and J. DEMOTES-MAINARD

Edition

BMJ Open, London, BMJ Publishing Group, 2017, 2044-6055

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30218 General and internal medicine

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 2.413

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/17:00121479

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

000423826700163

Keywords in English

clinical trials; individual participant data

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 28/4/2021 08:47, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

Objectives We examined major issues associated with sharing of individual clinical trial data and developed a consensus document on providing access to individual participant data from clinical trials, using a broad interdisciplinary approach. Design and methods This was a consensus-building process among the members of a multistakeholder task force, involving a wide range of experts (researchers, patient representatives, methodologists, information technology experts, and representatives from funders, infrastructures and standards development organisations). An independent facilitator supported the process using the nominal group technique. The consensus was reached in a series of three workshops held over 1 year, supported by exchange of documents and teleconferences within focused subgroups when needed. This work was set within the Horizon 2020-funded project CORBEL (Coordinated Research Infrastructures Building Enduring Life-science Services) and coordinated by the European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network. Thus, the focus was on non-commercial trials and the perspective mainly European. Outcome We developed principles and practical recommendations on how to share data from clinical trials. Results The task force reached consensus on 10 principles and 50 recommendations, representing the fundamental requirements of any framework used for the sharing of clinical trials data. The document covers the following main areas: making data sharing a reality (eg, cultural change, academic incentives, funding), consent for data sharing, protection of trial participants (eg, de-identification), data standards, rights, types and management of access (eg, data request and access models), data management and repositories, discoverability, and metadata. Conclusions The adoption of the recommendations in this document would help to promote and support data sharing and reuse among researchers, adequately inform trial participants and protect their rights, and provide effective and efficient systems for preparing, storing and accessing data. The recommendations now need to be implemented and tested in practice. Further work needs to be done to integrate these proposals with those from other geographical areas and other academic domains.

Links

90090, large research infrastructures
Name: CZECRIN II