Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
Reply to: findings of two independent surveys on rapid sequence induction Deliberate practice should be reinforced
KLUČKA, Jozef, Martina KOSINOVÁ, Petr ŠTOURAČ and Milan KRATOCHVÍLBasic information
Original name
Reply to: findings of two independent surveys on rapid sequence induction Deliberate practice should be reinforced
Authors
KLUČKA, Jozef (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Martina KOSINOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr ŠTOURAČ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Milan KRATOCHVÍL (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution)
Edition
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021, 0265-0215
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30223 Anaesthesiology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.183
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121760
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000612154900024
Keywords in English
rapid sequence induction
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 17/5/2022 09:48, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
We are pleased that our survey has brought attention to rapid sequence induction (RSI). We want to congratulate Zdravkovic et al. on their survey. The actual number of respondents reaching 10 003 is far beyond every previously published survey. However, our aim was slightly different from that of Dr Zdravkovic. We aimed directly at the members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) (maybe in an old-fashioned way – an e-mail) as we tried to address clinically active and registered anaesthesiology practitioners. Currently, there are several published surveys regarding RSI. However, none of them directly compares adult versus paediatric practice. The designs of the studies by Zdravkovic et al. and Klucka et al. are slightly different; the hypothetic clinical patient is considered in Zdravkovic et al. versus the description of the respondents’ RSI routine clinical practice in the Klucka et al. survey.
Links
MUNI/A/0943/2019, interní kód MU |
| ||
MUNI/A/0966/2019, interní kód MU |
| ||
MUNI/A/1153/2020, interní kód MU |
| ||
ROZV/28/LF8/2020, interní kód MU |
| ||
ROZV/28/LF9/2020, interní kód MU |
|