Podrobný výpis o publikaci

MACONOCHIE, IK, R AICKIN, MF HAZINSKI, DL ATKINS, R BINGHAM, TB COUTO, AM GUERGUERIAN, VM NADKARNI, KC NG, GA NUTHALL, GYK ONG, AG REIS, SM SCHEXNAYDER, BR SCHOLEFIELD, JA TIJSSEN, JP NOLAN, PT MORLEY, de Voorde P VAN, AL ZARITSKY a Jana DJAKOW. Pediatric Life Support 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. RESUSCITATION. CLARE: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, roč. 156, s. "A120"-"A155", 36 s. ISSN 0300-9572. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.013. 2020.

Další formáty: BibTeX LaTeX RIS

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1785599
AU  - Maconochie, IK - Aickin, R - Hazinski, MF - Atkins, DL - Bingham, R - Couto, TB - Guerguerian, AM - Nadkarni, VM - Ng, KC - Nuthall, GA - Ong, GYK - Reis, AG - Schexnayder, SM - Scholefield, BR - Tijssen, JA - Nolan, JP - Morley, PT - Van, de Voorde P - Zaritsky, AL - Djakow, Jana
PY  - 2020
TI  - Pediatric Life Support 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations
JF  - RESUSCITATION
VL  - 156
SP  - "A120"-"A155"
EP  - "A120"-"A155"
PB  - ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
SN  - 03009572
KW  - AHA Scientific Statements
KW  - arrhythmia
KW  - cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW  - child
KW  - congenital heart disease
KW  - ECMO
KW  - pediatrics
N2  - This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) for pediatric life support is based on the most extensive evidence evaluation ever performed by the Pediatric Life Support Task Force. Three types of evidence evaluation were used in this review: systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence updates. Per agreement with the evidence evaluation recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, only systematic reviews could result in a new or revised treatment recommendation. Systematic reviews performed for this 2020 CoSTR for pediatric life support included the topics of sequencing of airway-breaths-compressions versus compressions-airway-breaths in the delivery of pediatric basic life support, the initial timing and dose intervals for epinephrine administration during resuscitation, and the targets for oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in pediatric patients after return of spontaneous circulation. The most controversial topics included the initial timing and dose intervals of epinephrine administration (new treatment recommendations were made) and the administration of fluid for infants and children with septic shock (this latter topic was evaluated by evidence update). All evidence reviews identified the paucity of pediatric data and the need for more research involving resuscitation of infants and children.
ER  -

Základní údaje
Originální název	Pediatric Life Support 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations
Autoři	MACONOCHIE, IK, R AICKIN, MF HAZINSKI, DL ATKINS, R BINGHAM, TB COUTO, AM GUERGUERIAN, VM NADKARNI, KC NG, GA NUTHALL, GYK ONG, AG REIS, SM SCHEXNAYDER, BR SCHOLEFIELD, JA TIJSSEN, JP NOLAN, PT MORLEY, de Voorde P VAN, AL ZARITSKY a Jana DJAKOW.
Vydání	RESUSCITATION, CLARE, ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, 2020, 0300-9572.

Další údaje
Originální jazyk	angličtina
Typ výsledku	Článek v odborném periodiku
Utajení	není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor	Impact factor: 5.262
Organizační jednotka	Lékařská fakulta
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.013
UT WoS	000581165500005
Klíčová slova anglicky	AHA Scientific Statements; arrhythmia; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; child; congenital heart disease; ECMO; pediatrics
Změnil	Změnila: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Změněno: 31. 3. 2022 08:30.

Anotace
This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) for pediatric life support is based on the most extensive evidence evaluation ever performed by the Pediatric Life Support Task Force. Three types of evidence evaluation were used in this review: systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence updates. Per agreement with the evidence evaluation recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, only systematic reviews could result in a new or revised treatment recommendation. Systematic reviews performed for this 2020 CoSTR for pediatric life support included the topics of sequencing of airway-breaths-compressions versus compressions-airway-breaths in the delivery of pediatric basic life support, the initial timing and dose intervals for epinephrine administration during resuscitation, and the targets for oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in pediatric patients after return of spontaneous circulation. The most controversial topics included the initial timing and dose intervals of epinephrine administration (new treatment recommendations were made) and the administration of fluid for infants and children with septic shock (this latter topic was evaluated by evidence update). All evidence reviews identified the paucity of pediatric data and the need for more research involving resuscitation of infants and children.

Anotace

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) for pediatric life support is based on the most extensive evidence evaluation ever performed by the Pediatric Life Support Task Force. Three types of evidence evaluation were used in this review: systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence updates. Per agreement with the evidence evaluation recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, only systematic reviews could result in a new or revised treatment recommendation. Systematic reviews performed for this 2020 CoSTR for pediatric life support included the topics of sequencing of airway-breaths-compressions versus compressions-airway-breaths in the delivery of pediatric basic life support, the initial timing and dose intervals for epinephrine administration during resuscitation, and the targets for oxygen and carbon dioxide levels in pediatric patients after return of spontaneous circulation. The most controversial topics included the initial timing and dose intervals of epinephrine administration (new treatment recommendations were made) and the administration of fluid for infants and children with septic shock (this latter topic was evaluated by evidence update). All evidence reviews identified the paucity of pediatric data and the need for more research involving resuscitation of infants and children.