GIMUNOVÁ, Marta, Michal BOZDĚCH, Alena SKOTÁKOVÁ, Vojtěch GRÜN and Hana VÁLKOVÁ. Comparison of forward and backward gait in males with and without intellectual disabilities. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH. HOBOKEN: WILEY, 2021, vol. 65, No 10, p. 922-929. ISSN 0964-2633. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12873.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Comparison of forward and backward gait in males with and without intellectual disabilities
Authors GIMUNOVÁ, Marta (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Michal BOZDĚCH (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Alena SKOTÁKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Vojtěch GRÜN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Hana VÁLKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, HOBOKEN, WILEY, 2021, 0964-2633.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30306 Sport and fitness sciences
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.646
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14510/21:00122101
Organization unit Faculty of Sports Studies
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12873
UT WoS 000681206000001
Keywords in English backward gait; Down syndrome; forward gait; intellectual disability; Special Olympics
Tags JS2021 d4402 rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Pavlína Roučová, DiS., učo 169540. Changed: 21/4/2022 14:20.
Abstract
Background Intellectual disabilities (ID) affect both cognitive and motor functions. The backward gait is a daily activity and its assessment is used for fall risk estimation and training in the general population. For proper use of backward gait as a rehabilitation tool and in fall prevention programmes for people with ID, it is necessary to determine the backward gait characteristics in the ID population. The aim of this study was to compare the differences between forward and backward gait in persons with nonsyndromic mild and moderate ID, persons with Down syndrome (DS) and a control group of healthy adults. Methods Fifty males divided into four groups (mild ID: n = 15, moderate ID: n = 19, DS: n = 6, controls: n = 10) participated in this study. All participants were asked to walk both forward and backward, barefooted and at their natural velocity on a Zebris FDM platform. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare differences between the analysed groups in forward and backward gait. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between forward and backward gait within each group. Results The velocity was significantly slower in moderate ID and DS compared to controls in forward and backward gait. When comparing forward and backward gait within each group, the gait velocity decreased in backward gait compared with forward gait by 21.80% in controls, by 33.89% in mild ID, by 34.45% in moderate ID, and by 40.32% in DS. In both moderate ID and DS, the mean backward velocity was slower than 2.16 km/h, the velocity used to identify elderly fallers in the general population. Conclusions Gait velocity was especially affected in DS and moderate ID compared with controls. In both mentioned groups, the backward gait velocity suggests an increased risk of falling. Future studies are necessary to examine the possibility of improving balance control and leg muscle strength by backward walking training in the ID population.
Links
MUNI/A/1082/2019, interní kód MUName: Analýza chůze specifických skupin populace (Acronym: Chůze seniorů a osob s MP)
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 30/7/2024 21:27