FOLETTI, Ivan. Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia. Convivium: Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean. 2021, vol. 8, Supplementum 1, p. 18-25. ISSN 2336-3452.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Belting Before Belting From Moscow, to Constantinople, and to Georgia
Authors FOLETTI, Ivan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Convivium: Exchanges and Interactions in the Arts of Medieval Europe, Byzantium, and the Mediterranean, 2021, 2336-3452.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 60401 Arts, Art history
Country of publisher Belgium
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/21:00119189
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
UT WoS 000696183700002
Keywords in English Hans Belting; Byzantine art; Georgian art; historiography; Viktor Lazarev; nationalism; Ts’alenjikha; u.s.s.r.
Tags rivok
Changed by Changed by: prof. Mgr. Ondřej Jakubec, Ph.D., učo 108186. Changed: 22/4/2022 11:24.
Abstract
One of the last half century’s most important art historical theorists, Hans Belting has introduced revolutionary critical concepts and proposed new methodological solutions. Belting’s effect was beginning to be widely felt in 1979. While in Georgia studying the frescoes of the late-fourteenth-century Constantinopolitan painter Manuel Eugenikos at Ts’alenjikha, he clashed with Viktor Lazarev, one of the foremost experts on Byzantine art. Using a strictly stylistic method, Belting opposed Lazarev’s denigration of Manuel Eugenikos as representing Byzantine decadence. To Lazarev’s crypto-nationalist discourse, he argued against an internationalist outlook rooted in thought developed in the 1950s by scholars at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington, d.c. As this article articulates, both positions are best understood as part of the dialectic debate on the role of Byzantine art that, since the early-twentieth century, countered the Russian/Soviet historiography and the cosmopolitan one supported by émigré scholars in Europe and the United States.
Links
GF21-01706L, research and development projectName: Kulturní dialogy v Jihokavkazském regionu ve středověku: historiografická a historicko-umělecká perspektiva (Acronym: CIMS)
Investor: Czech Science Foundation, Partner Agency
PrintDisplayed: 10/9/2024 23:21