Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1790679,
author = {Šikolová, Soňa and Urík, Milan and Hošnová, Dagmar and Kruntorád, Vít and Bartoš, Michal and Motyka, Oldřich and Jabandžiev, Petr},
article_location = {New York},
article_number = {7},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x},
keywords = {Active transcutaneous bone conduction implant; Children; Quality of lif; Atresia; Localisation; Hearing outcomes},
language = {eng},
issn = {0937-4477},
journal = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology},
title = {Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00405-021-07068-x},
volume = {279},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1790679
AU - Šikolová, Soňa - Urík, Milan - Hošnová, Dagmar - Kruntorád, Vít - Bartoš, Michal - Motyka, Oldřich - Jabandžiev, Petr
PY - 2022
TI - Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children
JF - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
VL - 279
IS - 7
SP - 3387-3398
EP - 3387-3398
PB - Springer
SN - 09374477
KW - Active transcutaneous bone conduction implant
KW - Children
KW - Quality of lif
KW - Atresia
KW - Localisation
KW - Hearing outcomes
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00405-021-07068-x
N2 - Purpose The study aimed to evaluate audiological benefits, quality of hearing and safety of two Bonebridge generation: BCI601 and BCI602 (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) in children. Methods Twelve children were implanted: five BCI601 and seven BCI602 comprising of ten conductive hearing loss, and two single sided deaf SSD subjects. Audiological outcomes tested were sound field audiometry, functional gain, speech recognition threshold (SRT50), speech recognition in noise (SPRINT) and localisation abilities. Subjective measures were Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12). Results The mean FG with the BCI601 was 25.0 dB and with the BCI602 28.0 dB. The benefit in SRT50 was 23.2 dB and 33.8 dB, respectively. The mean benefit in SPRINT was 15% and 6.7% and the localisation ability improved from 33.3° to 16° and from 26.2° to 17.6°, respectively. The two SSD subjects reported a FG of 17 dB, a benefit in SRT50 of 22.5 and a benefit in SPRINT of 20%. Subjective outcomes improved significantly and even exceeded the values of their age-and sex matched normal hearing peers. One revision was reported: a retroauricular emphysema above the implant occurred 12 months post-OP, it was resolved operatively with the implant still being functional. Conclusion The pediatric cohort reports significant audiological benefit, even exceeding that of the age- and sex matched control. The combination of the high safety and audiological benefit makes the Bonebridge a comfortable and effective option in hearing rehabilitation in children.
ER -
ŠIKOLOVÁ, Soňa, Milan URÍK, Dagmar HOŠNOVÁ, Vít KRUNTORÁD, Michal BARTOŠ, Oldřich MOTYKA and Petr JABANDŽIEV. Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children. \textit{European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology}. New York: Springer, 2022, vol.~279, No~7, p.~3387-3398. ISSN~0937-4477. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x.
|
