Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
PITTERMANNOVÁ, Pavlína, Alena ŽÁKOVSKÁ, Petr VÁŇA, Jiřina MARKOVÁ, František TREML et. al.Basic information
Original name
Wild Small Mammals and Ticks in Zoos—Reservoir of Agents with Zoonotic Potential?
Authors
PITTERMANNOVÁ, Pavlína (203 Czech Republic), Alena ŽÁKOVSKÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr VÁŇA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiřina MARKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), František TREML (203 Czech Republic), Lenka ČERNÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Marie BUDÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Eva BÁRTOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
Pathogens, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, MDPI, 2021, 2076-0817
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10613 Zoology
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.531
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14510/21:00122465
Organization unit
Faculty of Sports Studies
UT WoS
000666242200001
Keywords in English
Anaplasma; Borrelia; Coxiella; Francisella; Leptospira; Rickettsia
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/2/2023 08:19, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
Wild small mammals and ticks play an important role in maintaining and spreading zoonoses in nature, as well as in captive animals. The aim of this study was to monitor selected agents with zoonotic potential in their reservoirs and vectors in a zoo, and to draw attention to the risk of possible contact with these pathogens. In total, 117 wild small mammals (rodents) and 166 ticks were collected in the area of Brno Zoo. Antibodies to the bacteria Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. were detected by a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 19% (19/99), 4% (4/99), and 15% (15/99) of rodents, respectively. Antibodies to Leptospira spp. bacteria were detected by the microscopic agglutination test in 6% (4/63) of rodents. Coinfection (antibodies to more than two agents) were proved in 14.5% (15/97) of animals. The prevalence of C. burnetii statistically differed according to the years of trapping (p = 0.0241). The DNAs of B. burgdorferi s.l., Rickettsia sp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were detected by PCR in 16%, 6%, and 1% of ticks, respectively, without coinfection and without effect of life stage and sex of ticks on positivity. Sequencing showed homology with R. helvetica and A. phagocytophilum in four and one positive samples, respectively. The results of our study show that wild small mammals and ticks in a zoo could serve as reservoirs and vectors of infectious agents with zoonotic potential and thus present a risk of infection to zoo animals and also to keepers and visitors to a zoo.