| BAŤALÍK, Ladislav, G. PEPERA, J. PAPATHANASIOU, S. RUTKOWSKI, D. LISKA, K. BATALIKOVA, M. HARTMAN, Marián FELŠŐCI and Filip DOSBABA. Is the Training Intensity in Phase Two Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Different in Telehealth versus Outpatient Rehabilitation? Journal of Clinical Medicine. Basel: MDPI, 2021, vol. 10, No 18, p. 1-11. ISSN 2077-0383. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184069. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1795558,
author = {Baťalík, Ladislav and Pepera, G. and Papathanasiou, J. and Rutkowski, S. and Liska, D. and Batalikova, K. and Hartman, M. and Felšőci, Marián and Dosbaba, Filip},
article_location = {Basel},
article_number = {18},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184069},
keywords = {cardiovascular rehabilitation; telehealth; physical exercise; coronary artery disease; heart rate disease; telerehabilitation; outpatient rehabilitation},
language = {eng},
issn = {2077-0383},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
title = {Is the Training Intensity in Phase Two Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Different in Telehealth versus Outpatient Rehabilitation?},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/18/4069},
volume = {10},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1795558
AU - Baťalík, Ladislav - Pepera, G. - Papathanasiou, J. - Rutkowski, S. - Liska, D. - Batalikova, K. - Hartman, M. - Felšőci, Marián - Dosbaba, Filip
PY - 2021
TI - Is the Training Intensity in Phase Two Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Different in Telehealth versus Outpatient Rehabilitation?
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
VL - 10
IS - 18
SP - 1-11
EP - 1-11
PB - MDPI
SN - 20770383
KW - cardiovascular rehabilitation
KW - telehealth
KW - physical exercise
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - heart rate disease
KW - telerehabilitation
KW - outpatient rehabilitation
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/18/4069
N2 - Telehealth cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a feasible and effective alternative to conventional outpatient CR. Present evidence is limited on the comparison of exercise intensity adherence in telehealth and outpatient CR. The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare training intensity adherence through 12-week phase II CR in telehealth and outpatient CR. A sample of 56 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) with a mean age of 56.7 +/- 7.1 entering comprehensive secondary prevention phase II was randomized into telehealth CR (n = 28) and control outpatient CR (n = 28) groups. The primary outcome was a comparison of training intensity adherence in both CR models and heart rate (HR) response from individual CR sessions, expressed by the HR reserve percentage. As a result, the parameter HR reserve percentage as the total average of the training intensity during the telehealth intervention and the outpatient CR did not differ statistically (p = 0.63). There was no death case, and all severe adverse cases required medical admission throughout an exercise training session in study subjects in both groups. This research evidence demonstrated that the telehealth CR model is similar in training intensities to the conventional outpatient CR in CAD patients with low to moderate cardiovascular risk.
ER -
BAŤALÍK, Ladislav, G. PEPERA, J. PAPATHANASIOU, S. RUTKOWSKI, D. LISKA, K. BATALIKOVA, M. HARTMAN, Marián FELŠ$\backslash$H OCI and Filip DOSBABA. Is the Training Intensity in Phase Two Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Different in Telehealth versus Outpatient Rehabilitation? \textit{Journal of Clinical Medicine}. Basel: MDPI, 2021, vol.~10, No~18, p.~1-11. ISSN~2077-0383. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184069.
|
