Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1795878,
author = {Baroš, Jiří},
article_location = {Paris},
article_number = {4},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rmm.214.0507},
keywords = {common good; disagreement; liberalism; new theory of natural law; perfectionism; political liberalism; natural law; public justification; public reason},
language = {eng},
issn = {0035-1571},
journal = {Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale},
title = {Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response},
url = {https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2021-4-page-507.htm},
volume = {112},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1795878
AU - Baroš, Jiří
PY - 2021
TI - Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response
JF - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale
VL - 112
IS - 4
SP - 507-524
EP - 507-524
PB - Presses Universitaires de France
SN - 00351571
KW - common good
KW - disagreement
KW - liberalism
KW - new theory of natural law
KW - perfectionism
KW - political liberalism
KW - natural law
KW - public justification
KW - public reason
UR - https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2021-4-page-507.htm
N2 - A persistent puzzle for practical philosophy centres on finding the appropriate path to justify the laws whose purpose is to regulate the functioning of constitutional democracies. Public reason liberals deny that this justification could come from comprehensive doctrines, since the laws must be justifiable to all (reasonable) citizens. The natural law tradition offers a useful test of the plausibility of this claim. This article illustrates how the two versions of public reason liberalism differ in their openness to natural law reasons, and why, given the influence of their disparate starting points on the normative standards by which they assess laws, natural law exponents have good reason to reject both.
ER -
BAROŠ, Jiří. Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response. \textit{Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale}. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2021, vol.~112, No~4, p.~507-524. ISSN~0035-1571. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rmm.214.0507.
|
