Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Effects of Seating Arrangement on Students' Interaction in Group Reflective Practice
NEHYBA, Jan, Libor JUHAŇÁK and Jakub CIGÁNBasic information
Original name
Effects of Seating Arrangement on Students' Interaction in Group Reflective Practice
Authors
NEHYBA, Jan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Libor JUHAŇÁK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Jakub CIGÁN (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, ABINGDON, ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. 2023, 0022-0973
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.200 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14410/23:00129923
Organization unit
Faculty of Education
UT WoS
000701522000001
Keywords in English
Group reflective practice; student teachers; turn-taking; facilitation; multilevel modeling; seating arrangement; sociometric badges
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 1/3/2023 15:18, Mgr. Daniela Marcollová
Abstract
V originále
In the conducted field experiment, we explore the intensity of university students' interaction related to the seating arrangement (circle or rows) in pre-service teachers' groups during the reflective practice. We also probe the differences across the various fields of study and evaluate the facilitator's influence on the interaction. We use wearable electronic Sociometric badges 2.0 to measure the interaction intensity (assessed by speech rate and average speaking segment length). We performed a total of 153 repeated measurements on 58 students in 4 different fields of study (Mathematics, Physics, Music, and Civic Education) using a counterbalanced design with a total of four measurements (two in circle and two in rows) in each group. Results of the multilevel modeling analysis indicate more intensive interaction in rows than in circles. However, the findings also indicate significant moderation by the field of study and partially by the extent of facilitator involvement.