LUKL, Jiří. Degrees of referential importance : Intuitive, lexicogrammatical, and text frequency approaches. In 15th ESSE Conference, online, 30 August-3 September, 2021, Lyon, France. 2021.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Degrees of referential importance : Intuitive, lexicogrammatical, and text frequency approaches
Authors LUKL, Jiří.
Edition 15th ESSE Conference, online, 30 August-3 September, 2021, Lyon, France, 2021.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Presentations at conferences
Field of Study 60203 Linguistics
Country of publisher France
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
Keywords in English Referential importance; referentiality; Chafe; text frequency; reader intuition; means of expression; degrees of syntactic prominence
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Jana Pelclová, Ph.D., učo 39970. Changed: 2/2/2022 10:03.
Abstract
A continuing interest of the author of the present contribution has been Wallace Chafe’s view of referents in the flow of communication constituting a hierarchical system of importance of at least three ranks: primary, secondary, and trivial (Chafe, 1994, pp. 88–91). Chafe first attempts a method of ranking of referents based on lexicogrammar (pp. 88–89) but ultimately suggests that the most reliable method is one where referent importance is directly proportional to their text frequency. He also points to an article by Wright & Givón (1987), where referential importance is based on intuitive evaluations of four independent judges. All three approaches are taken up in the present study. In it, several simple assumptions are made concerning the approaches. In the text frequency approach, it is assumed that the more frequent a referent is, the more important it is. In the lexicogrammar approach, two assumptions are made, namely, that a) more important referents tend to occupy more prominent syntactic positions, such as the subject; and b) more important referents tend to be encoded with uniquely identifying referring expressions. These assumptions are then compared with intuitive judgements of 10 different people, whose task was to rank-order referents based on their perceived importance. The result of this comparison is a more refined and robust scale of referential importance, one that can be further tested and expanded by incorporating other variables, such as salience and recipients’ (assumed) background knowledge. The study is based on an analysis of five corpora, each containing approximately 1,850 words.
Links
MUNI/A/1204/2019, interní kód MUName: Researching Communication in English: Paradigms, Strategies, Developments - II (Acronym: ReComE 2020)
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 17/8/2024 19:20