HLINOMAZ, Ota, Zuzana MOTOVSKA, Jiri KNOT, Roman MIKLÍK, Mulham SABBAH, Milan HROMADKA, Ivo VARVAROVSKY, Jaroslav DUSEK, Michal SVOBODA, Frantisek TOUSEK, Bohumil MAJTAN, Stanislav SIMEK, Marian BRANNY a Jiří JARKOVSKÝ. Stent Selection for Primary Angioplasty and Outcomes in the Era of Potent Antiplatelets. Data from the Multicenter Randomized Prague-18 Trial. Online. Journal of Clinical Medicine. Basel: MDPI, 2021, roč. 10, č. 21, s. 1-12. ISSN 2077-0383. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215103. [citováno 2024-04-24]
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Stent Selection for Primary Angioplasty and Outcomes in the Era of Potent Antiplatelets. Data from the Multicenter Randomized Prague-18 Trial
Autoři HLINOMAZ, Ota (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zuzana MOTOVSKA (203 Česká republika), Jiri KNOT (203 Česká republika), Roman MIKLÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Mulham SABBAH (376 Izrael), Milan HROMADKA (203 Česká republika), Ivo VARVAROVSKY (203 Česká republika), Jaroslav DUSEK (203 Česká republika), Michal SVOBODA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Frantisek TOUSEK (203 Česká republika), Bohumil MAJTAN (203 Česká republika), Stanislav SIMEK (203 Česká republika), Marian BRANNY (203 Česká republika) a Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání Journal of Clinical Medicine, Basel, MDPI, 2021, 2077-0383.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30218 General and internal medicine
Stát vydavatele Švýcarsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 4.964
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/21:00123117
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215103
UT WoS 000718744300001
Klíčová slova anglicky acute myocardial infarction; primary angioplasty; drug-eluting stent; bare-metal stent; bioresorbable scaffolds; ticagrelor; prasugrel
Štítky 14110115, 14110211, 14119612, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Změněno: 6. 12. 2021 09:22.
Anotace
Drug-eluting stents (DES) are the recommended stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to determine why interventional cardiologists used non-DES and how it influenced patient prognoses. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the different stents were also compared in patients treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor. Of the PRAGUE-18 study patients, 749 (67.4%) were treated with DES, 296 (26.6%) with bare-metal stents (BMS), and 66 (5.9%) with bioabsorbable vascular scaffold/stents (BVS) between 2013 and 2016. Cardiogenic shock at presentation, left main coronary artery disease, especially as the culprit lesion, and right coronary artery stenosis were the reasons for selecting a BMS. The incidence of the primary composite net-clinical endpoint (EP) (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, serious bleeding, or revascularization) at seven days was 2.5% vs. 6.3% and 3.0% in the DES, vs. with BMS and BVS, respectively (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.419-5.15, p = 0.002 for BMS vs. DES and 1.25 (0.29-5.39) p = 0.76 for BVS vs. DES). Patients with BMS were at higher risk of death at 30 days (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.01-4.76; for BMS vs. DES, p = 0.045) and at one year (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.19-3.69; p = 0.01); they also had a higher composite of cardiac death, reinfarction, and stroke (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.0-2.74; p = 0.047) at one year. BMS were associated with a significantly higher rate of primary EP whether treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. In conclusion, patients with the highest initial risk profile were preferably treated with BMS over BVS. BMS were associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular events whether treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.

VytisknoutZobrazeno: 24. 4. 2024 10:17