J 2020

Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgM test in routine practice: Comparison with quantitative assessment of intrathecal IgM synthesis

ZEMAN, D., P. KUSNIEROVA, F. VSIANSKY, K. REGULIOVA, M. SKUTOVA et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgM test in routine practice: Comparison with quantitative assessment of intrathecal IgM synthesis

Authors

ZEMAN, D., P. KUSNIEROVA, F. VSIANSKY, K. REGULIOVA, M. SKUTOVA, I. WOZNICOVA, O. ZAPLETALOVA and P. HRADILEK

Edition

Clinica Chimica Acta, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2020, 0009-8981

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30230 Other clinical medicine subjects

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.786

UT WoS

000549228300021

Keywords (in Czech)

Oligoclonal IgM; Cerebrospinal fluid; Intrathecal synthesis; Multiple sclerosis

Keywords in English

Oligoclonal IgM; Cerebrospinal fluid; Intrathecal synthesis; Multiple sclerosis
Změněno: 7/12/2021 13:00, Bc. Hana Vladíková, BBA

Abstract

V originále

Background: Intrathecal IgM synthesis demonstrated either as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-restricted oligoclonal (o-) IgM bands or calculated using various formulas has been linked to more aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) course. However, the proportion of MS patients showing intrathecal IgM synthesis varies largely between studies. We aimed to explore the relation between different formulas and results of o-IgM, and to assess the frequency of o-IgM bands in an unselected series of samples. Methods: 432 samples were analyzed for o-IgM, o-IgG and quantitative measures of IgM and IgG synthesis. IgM index and formulas of Reiber, Auer and Ohman were compared to the result of the o-IgM test. Results: At the cut-off commonly used, the non-linear formulas for intrathecal synthesis were specific (> 94%) but rather insensitive (< 40% even at a cut-off of 4 CSF-restricted bands) compared to o-IgM. No significant difference was noted in the performance of different formulas. At a cut-off of 4 bands, 61% of MS patients, but none of the controls were positive for o-IgM. Conclusions: Formulas for intrathecal IgM synthesis are insensitive compared to o-IgM. We propose to evaluate samples with 2 or 3 extra-CSF IgM bands as borderline and only samples with 4 or more as definitely positive.

Links

90128, large research infrastructures
Name: CZECRIN III