Detailed Information on Publication Record
2020
Pilot study of the multicentre DISCHARGE Trial: image quality and protocol adherence results of computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography
RUBEIS, De., G. NAPP, A. E. SCHLATTMANN, P. GELEIJNS, J. LAULE et. al.Basic information
Original name
Pilot study of the multicentre DISCHARGE Trial: image quality and protocol adherence results of computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography
Authors
RUBEIS, De., G. NAPP, A. E. SCHLATTMANN, P. GELEIJNS, J. LAULE, M. DREGER, H. KOFOED, K. SORGAARD, M. ENGSTROM, T. TILSTED, H. H. BOI, A. PORCU, M. COSSA, S. RODRIGUEZ-PALOMARES, J. F. VALENTE, F. X. ROQUE, A. FEUCHTNER, G. PLANK, F. STECHOVSKY, C. ADLA, T. SCHROEDER, S. ZELESNY, T. GUTBERLET, M.. WOINKE, M. KAROLYI, M. KARADY, J. DONNELLY, P. BALL, P. DODD, J. HENSEY, M. MANCONE, M. CECCACCI, A. BERZINA, M. ZVAIGZNE, L. SAKALYTE, G. BASEVICIUS, A. ILNICKA-SUCKIEL, M. KUSMIERZ, D. FARIA, R. GAMA-RIBEIRO, V. BENEDEK, I. BENEDEK, T. ADJIC, F. CANKOVIC, M. BERRY, C. DELLES, C. THWAITE, E. DAVIS, G. KNUUTI, J. PIETILA, M. KEPKA, C. KRUK, M. VIDAKOVIC, R. NESKOVIC, A. N. LECUMBERRI, I. GONZALES, I. D. RUZSICS, B. FISHER, M. DEWEY and M. FRANCONE
Edition
European Radiology, New York, Springer, 2020, 0938-7994
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30230 Other clinical medicine subjects
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 5.315
UT WoS
000519659200020
Keywords in English
Medical imaging; CT angiography; Angiography; coronary; Coronary artery disease; Trial protocols
Tags
Změněno: 7/12/2021 12:59, Bc. Hana Vladíková, BBA
Abstract
V originále
Objective To implement detailed EU cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) quality criteria in the multicentre DISCHARGE trial (FP72007-2013, EC-GA 603266), we reviewed image quality and adherence to CCTA protocol and to the recommendations of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in a pilot study. Materials and methods From every clinical centre, imaging datasets of three patients per arm were assessed for adherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the pilot study, predefined standards for the CCTA protocol and ICA recommendations, image quality and non-diagnostic (NDX) rate. These parameters were compared via multinomial regression and ANOVA. If a site did not reach the minimum quality level, additional datasets had to be sent before entering into the final accepted database (FADB). Results We analysed 226 cases (150 CCTA/76 ICA). The inclusion/exclusion criteria were not met by 6 of the 226 (2.7%) datasets. The predefined standard was not met by 13 of 76 ICA datasets (17.1%). This percentage decreased between the initial CCTA database and the FADB (multinomial regression, 53 of 70 vs 17 of 75 [76%] vs [23%]). The signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the FADB did not improve significantly (ANOVA, p = 0.20; p = 0.09). The CTA NDX rate was reduced, but not significantly (initial CCTA database 15 of 70 [21.4%]) and FADB 9 of 75 [12%]; p = 0.13). Conclusion We were able to increase conformity to the inclusion/exclusion criteria and CCTA protocol, improve image quality and decrease the CCTA NDX rate by implementing EU CCTA quality criteria and ICA recommendations.
Links
90128, large research infrastructures |
|