ŠPELDA, Daniel. Hypotheses fingimus : Cartesian Natural Philosophy. Theory of Science. 2021, vol. 43, No 2, p. 165-190. ISSN 1210-0250. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.46938/tv.2021.517.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Hypotheses fingimus : Cartesian Natural Philosophy
Name in Czech „Hypotheses fingimus“ : Karteziánská přírodní filosofie
Authors ŠPELDA, Daniel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Theory of Science, 2021, 1210-0250.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 60301 Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/21:00119443
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.46938/tv.2021.517
Keywords (in Czech) René Descartes; novověká přírodní filosofie; mechanistická filosofie; hypotézy; experimentalismus
Keywords in English René Descartes; early modern natural philosophy; mechanical philosophy; hypotheses; experimentalism
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. et Mgr. Stanislav Hasil, učo 415267. Changed: 1/4/2022 13:16.
Abstract
In this paper, I would like to present the methodological views of two representatives of the early modern Cartesian school: Jacques Rohault and Pierre-Sylvain Régis.
Abstract (in Czech)
V tomto článku chci představit metodologické názory dvou představitelů novověké karteziánské školy: Jacquese Rohaulta a Pierre-Sylvaina Régise.
Links
GA20-01948S, research and development projectName: Idea vědeckého pokroku v raném osvícenství (1684-1740): Fontenelle a jeho současníci (Acronym: IVPRO-FAJS)
Investor: Czech Science Foundation
PrintDisplayed: 9/10/2024 06:12