J 2021

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol

KANTOROVÁ, Lucia, Jiri KANTOR, Jiří BÚŘIL, Petra BÚŘILOVÁ, Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol

Authors

KANTOROVÁ, Lucia (703 Slovakia, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Jiri KANTOR (203 Czech Republic), Jiří BÚŘIL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petra BÚŘILOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš NEČAS (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

BMJ Open, London, BMJ Publishing Group, 2021, 2044-6055

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30218 General and internal medicine

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.006

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/21:00123478

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

UT WoS

000730777400026

Keywords in English

protocols & guidelines; statistics & research methods; surgery; quality in health care

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 18/1/2022 09:02, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

Introduction Perioperative care is a broad field covering an array of elective and emergency procedures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perioperative care exist with various degrees of methodological quality. We intend to critically appraise them using AGREE II instrument and investigate the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Methods and analysis We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PROSPERO and did not identify any similar systematic review in this area. We will search databases, repositories and websites of guideline developers and medical societies, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), DynaMed, the GIN international guideline library and registry of guidelines in development, BIGG international database of GRADE guidelines, ECRI Guideline Trust or National Institute for Clinical Evidence to identify all CPGs for perioperative care in an adult population in a general clinical setting. We will include CPGs, expert guidance, position papers, guidance documents and consensus statements published in the last 5 years by experts or international organisations that provide guidance or recommendations in the available full text with no geographical or language limitation. Excluded will be those containing only good practice statements. Two independent reviewers will perform critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. The data presented in a narrative and tabular form will include the results of the critical appraisal for all identified CPGs for all AGREE II domains and an assessment of the use of the GRADE approach. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. We will disseminate the findings through professional networks and conference presentations and will publish the results.

Links

EF19_073/0016943, research and development project
Name: Interní grantová agentura Masarykovy univerzity
MUNI/IGA/1068/2020, interní kód MU
Name: Methodological and practical aspects of the development of guidelines and rapid guidelines in public health (Acronym: RAPguidelines-public-health)
Investor: Masaryk University