J 2022

Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study

STANĚK, Ján, Abanoub RIAD, Adam LE, Matěj BERNÁT, Milad HAMMAL et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors

STANĚK, Ján (203 Czech Republic), Abanoub RIAD (818 Egypt, belonging to the institution), Adam LE (203 Czech Republic), Matěj BERNÁT (203 Czech Republic), Milad HAMMAL and Basel AZAR

Edition

Materials, Basel, MDPI, 2022, 1996-1944

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30304 Public and environmental health

Country of publisher

Switzerland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.400

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/22:00125128

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

UT WoS

000752782000001

Keywords in English

cohort studies; complications; dental cements; inlay; onlay; overlay; resin cements; survival rate

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 5/4/2023 08:13, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical performance, survival, and complications of indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays on posterior teeth. Digital records of 282 patients treated between 2014 and 2018 were accessed and analyzed retrospectively. The included patients received 469 composite restorations luted with seven different resin-based types of cement, i.e., Filtek Ultimate Flow, Enamel Plus, Relyx Ultimate, Harvard Premium Flow, Relyx Unicem, Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable, and Filtek Ultimate. The restorations had been clinically and radiographically evaluated annually. The mechanical and clinical complications, e.g., debonding, fracture, and secondary caries, were evaluated and recorded. The examined restorations exhibited a high survival rate (84.9%), and failure was found in only 71 cases. Fracture was the most common cause (n = 36), followed by prosthetic work release (n = 19) and secondary caries (n = 16). There was a statistically significant difference between failure and cement material (Sig. < 0.001); the composite-based cements (87.2%) had a high survival rate compared to the resin-based cement (72.7%). Similarly, the cements with high viscosity (90.2%) had significantly higher survival rates than the low-viscosity cements (78.9%). Moreover, onlays showed higher longevity compared to overlays (Sig. = 0.007), and patients aged under 55 years showed less complications (Sig. = 0.036). Indirect composite restoration was a successful solution to tooth structure loss. The material of the cementation is an important part of the success. Higher survival rate was found in our study when the fixation materials with high viscosity were used, thus suggesting using these materials with indirect restorations. Composite-based cements had significantly higher survival rate than resin-based cements.

Links

EF19_073/0016943, research and development project
Name: Interní grantová agentura Masarykovy univerzity
MUNI/A/1608/2020, interní kód MU
Name: Prohlubování znalostí v oblasti zdravotních rizik a benefitů výživy, prostředí a životního stylu III
Investor: Masaryk University
MUNI/IGA/1543/2020, interní kód MU
Name: Evidence-based Practice of Healthcare Professionals and Students in the Czech Republic (Acronym: Evidence-Based Practice in Czechia)
Investor: Masaryk University