Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1818970,
author = {Kružíková, Agáta and Knapová, Lenka and Šmahel, David and Dědková, Lenka and Matyáš, Václav},
article_location = {Oxford},
article_number = {1},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102603},
keywords = {authentication; fingerprint; PIN; token; card reader; usable security; user study; online banking},
language = {eng},
issn = {0167-4048},
journal = {Computers & Security},
title = {Usable and secure? User perception of four authentication methods for mobile banking},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102603},
volume = {115},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1818970
AU - Kružíková, Agáta - Knapová, Lenka - Šmahel, David - Dědková, Lenka - Matyáš, Václav
PY - 2022
TI - Usable and secure? User perception of four authentication methods for mobile banking
JF - Computers & Security
VL - 115
IS - 1
SP - 1-12
EP - 1-12
PB - Elsevier
SN - 01674048
KW - authentication
KW - fingerprint
KW - PIN
KW - token
KW - card reader
KW - usable security
KW - user study
KW - online banking
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102603
N2 - Smartphone authentication is becoming a cornerstone security component, so it is necessary to have methods that are usable and secure to ensure adequate protection, especially for mobile banking. Though biometric authentication seems to be perceived as very usable by users, there is a lack of research to compare smartphone-based fingerprint verification to other authentication methods for mobile banking in terms of usability and perceived security. Using two independent samples, we conducted a study for a younger group aged 26-54 (N = 229) and an older group aged 55+ (N = 239) about their perceptions of the usability and security of four authentication methods: fingerprint, PIN, token, and card reader. All four methods were evaluated positively for both usability and security, with fingerprint verification evaluated as the most usable and the most secure method for mobile banking. Interestingly, none of our hypothesized predictors (i.e., age, gender, education, smartphone self-efficacy, smartphone security behaviour, knowledge of secure smartphone behaviour) was consistently related to how users perceive the usability and security of the examined methods. This suggests that smartphone users would be able to successfully adopt, and be quite satisfied with, any of the tested methods, regardless of demography or smartphone skills.
ER -
KRUŽÍKOVÁ, Agáta, Lenka KNAPOVÁ, David ŠMAHEL, Lenka DĚDKOVÁ and Václav MATYÁŠ. Usable and secure? User perception of four authentication methods for mobile banking. \textit{Computers \&{} Security}. Oxford: Elsevier, 2022, vol.~115, No~1, p.~1-12. ISSN~0167-4048. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102603.
|
