Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
Short-term Outcomes of Water Vapor Therapy (Rezum) for BPH/LUTS in the First Czech Cohort
WASSERBAUER, Roman, Dalibor PACIK, Gabriel VARGA, Vítězslav VÍT, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Short-term Outcomes of Water Vapor Therapy (Rezum) for BPH/LUTS in the First Czech Cohort
Authors
WASSERBAUER, Roman (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Dalibor PACIK (203 Czech Republic), Gabriel VARGA (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Vítězslav VÍT (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Michal FEDORKO (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution)
Edition
UROLOGY JOURNAL, TEHRAN, UROL & NEPHROL RES CTR-UNRC, 2021, 1735-1308
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30217 Urology and nephrology
Country of publisher
Islamic Republic of Iran
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.555
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00124058
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000747743200004
Keywords in English
benign prostatic hyperplasia; lower urinary tract symptoms; minimally invasive treatment; vapor; water
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 17/5/2022 13:05, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Purpose: To evaluate the short-term results of water vapor therapy (RezUm) for BPH/LUTS in the first cohort of Czech patients. Materials and methods: Patients with BPH and moderate to severe LUTS (N = 76) who underwent RezUm treatment from December 2019 to July 2020 were included in the prospective study. Prior to the procedure, they completed the IPSS and OABv8 questionnaires and underwent uroflowmetry, transrectal ultrasound of the prostate, and PSA sampling. The parameters before and 3 months after the procedure were compared and statistically evaluated. Results: The study protocol was completed by 92% of patients (N = 70). We observed a significant increase in Qmax (median 17.7 vs. 8.8 mL/s, P < .001), Qave (9 vs. 4.5 mL/s, P = .001) and voided volume (241 vs. 171 mL, P < .001) and a significant reduction in post-void residual (average 17.5 vs. 67.7 mL), prostate volume (39.3 vs. 62.3 mL) and total PSA (median 1.9 vs. 2.5 ng/mL, resp. P values < .001). There was also a significant decrease in OABv8 score (average 7.6 vs. 16.6, P < .001) and IPSS QoL (1.6 vs. 4.0, P = .037). The improvement in the IPSS score was apparent, yet statistically insignificant (6.8 vs. 16, P = .079). Conclusion: Water vapor therapy is an effective and safe method of BPH/LUTS treatment in the short-term.