KLIONSKY, DJ., AK. ABDEL-AZIZ, S. ABDELFATAH, M. ABDELLATIF, A. ABDOLI, S. ABEL, H. ABELIOVICH, MH. ABILDGAARD, YP. ABUDU, A. ACEVEDO-AROZENA, IE. ADAMOPOULOS, K. ADELI, TE. ADOLPH, A. ADORNETTO, E. AFLAKI, G. AGAM, A. AGARWAL, BB. AGGARWAL, M. AGNELLO, P. AGOSTINIS, JN. AGREWALA, A. AGROTIS, PV. AGUILAR, ST. AHMAD, ZM. AHMED, U. AHUMADA-CASTRO, S. AITS, S. AIZAWA, Y. AKKOC, T. AKOUMIANAKI, HA. AKPINAR, AM. AL-ABD, L. AL-AKRA, A. AL-GHARAIBEH, MA. ALAOUI-JAMALI, S. ALBERTI, E. ALCOCER-GÓMEZ, C. ALESSANDRI, M. ALI, MA. ALIM AL-BARI, S. ALIWAINI, J. ALIZADEH, E. ALMACELLAS, A. ALMASAN, A. ALONSO, GD. ALONSO, N. ALTAN-BONNET, DC. ALTIERI, EMC. ÁLVAREZ, S. ALVES, C. ALVES DA COSTA, MM. ALZAHARNA, M. AMADIO, C. AMANTINI, C. AMARAL, S. AMBROSIO, AO. AMER, V. AMMANATHAN, Z. AN, SU. ANDERSEN, SA. ANDRABI, M. ANDRADE-SILVA, AM. ANDRES, S. ANGELINI, D. ANN, UC. ANOZIE, MY. ANSARI, P. ANTAS, A. ANTEBI, Z. ANTÓN, T. ANWAR, L. APETOH, N. APOSTOLOVA, T. ARAKI, Y. ARAKI, K. ARASAKI, WL ARAÚJO., J. ARAYA, C. ARDEN, MA. ARÉVALO, S. ARGUELLES, E. ARIAS, Iva SLANINOVÁ and ET AL. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition). Autophagy. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis INC, 2021, vol. 17, No 1, p. 1-382. ISSN 1554-8627. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)
Authors KLIONSKY, DJ., AK. ABDEL-AZIZ, S. ABDELFATAH, M. ABDELLATIF, A. ABDOLI, S. ABEL, H. ABELIOVICH, MH. ABILDGAARD, YP. ABUDU, A. ACEVEDO-AROZENA, IE. ADAMOPOULOS, K. ADELI, TE. ADOLPH, A. ADORNETTO, E. AFLAKI, G. AGAM, A. AGARWAL, BB. AGGARWAL, M. AGNELLO, P. AGOSTINIS, JN. AGREWALA, A. AGROTIS, PV. AGUILAR, ST. AHMAD, ZM. AHMED, U. AHUMADA-CASTRO, S. AITS, S. AIZAWA, Y. AKKOC, T. AKOUMIANAKI, HA. AKPINAR, AM. AL-ABD, L. AL-AKRA, A. AL-GHARAIBEH, MA. ALAOUI-JAMALI, S. ALBERTI, E. ALCOCER-GÓMEZ, C. ALESSANDRI, M. ALI, MA. ALIM AL-BARI, S. ALIWAINI, J. ALIZADEH, E. ALMACELLAS, A. ALMASAN, A. ALONSO, GD. ALONSO, N. ALTAN-BONNET, DC. ALTIERI, EMC. ÁLVAREZ, S. ALVES, C. ALVES DA COSTA, MM. ALZAHARNA, M. AMADIO, C. AMANTINI, C. AMARAL, S. AMBROSIO, AO. AMER, V. AMMANATHAN, Z. AN, SU. ANDERSEN, SA. ANDRABI, M. ANDRADE-SILVA, AM. ANDRES, S. ANGELINI, D. ANN, UC. ANOZIE, MY. ANSARI, P. ANTAS, A. ANTEBI, Z. ANTÓN, T. ANWAR, L. APETOH, N. APOSTOLOVA, T. ARAKI, Y. ARAKI, K. ARASAKI, WL ARAÚJO., J. ARAYA, C. ARDEN, MA. ARÉVALO, S. ARGUELLES, E. ARIAS, Iva SLANINOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and ET AL.
Edition Autophagy, Philadelphia, Taylor & Francis INC, 2021, 1554-8627.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 10601 Cell biology
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 13.391
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/21:00124317
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
UT WoS 000636121800001
Keywords in English Autophagosome; cancer; flux; LC3; lysosome; macroautophagy; neurodegeneration; phagophore; stress; vacuole
Tags 14110513, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 20/5/2022 12:26.
Abstract
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
PrintDisplayed: 29/7/2024 08:29