Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
DEWIDAR, O., T. LOTFI, M. W. LANGENDAM, E. PARMELLI, Z. SAZ PARKINSON et. al.Basic information
Original name
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Authors
DEWIDAR, O., T. LOTFI, M. W. LANGENDAM, E. PARMELLI, Z. SAZ PARKINSON, K. SOLO, D. K. CHU, J. L. MATHEW, E. A. AKL, R. BRIGNARDELLO-PETERSEN, R. A. MUSTAFA, L. MOJA, A. IORIO, Y. CHI, C. CANELO-AYBAR, T. KREDO, J. KARPUSHEFF, A. F. TURGEON, P. ALONSO-COELLO, W. WIERCIOCH, A. GERRITSEN, Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), M. X. ROJAS, P. TUGWELL, V. A. WELCH, K. POTTIE, Z. MUNN, R. NIEUWLAAT, N. FORD, A. STEVENS, J. KHABSA, Z. NASIR, G. LEONTIADIS, J. MEERPOHL, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, M. MATTHEWS and H. J. SCHÜNEMANN (guarantor)
Edition
BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, London, BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2023, 2515-446X
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30230 Other clinical medicine subjects
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 5.800 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00129963
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000783805700001
Keywords in English
COVID-19; Evidence-Based Practice
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 26/1/2024 09:54, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
An evidence-based approach is considered the gold standard for health decision-making. Sometimes, a guideline panel might judge the certainty that the desirable effects of an intervention clearly outweigh its undesirable effects as high, but the body of supportive evidence is indirect. In such cases, the application of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach for grading the strength of recommendations is inappropriate. Instead, the GRADE Working Group has recommended developing ungraded best or good practice statement (GPS) and developed guidance under which circumsances they would be appropriate.Through an evaluation of COVID-1- related recommendations on the eCOVID Recommendation Map (COVID-19.recmap.org), we found that recommendations qualifying a GPS were widespread. However, guideline developers failed to label them as GPS or transparently report justifications for their development. We identified ways to improve and facilitate the operationalisation and implementation of the GRADE guidance for GPS.Herein, we propose a structured process for the development of GPSs that includes applying a sequential order for the GRADE guidance for developing GPS. This operationalisation considers relevant evidence-to-decision criteria when assessing the net consequences of implementing the statement, and reporting information supporting judgments for each criterion. We also propose a standardised table to facilitate the identification of GPS and reporting of their development. This operationalised guidance, if endorsed by guideline developers, may palliate some of the shortcomings identified. Our proposal may also inform future updates of the GRADE guidance for GPS.