Detailed Information on Publication Record
2022
Facilitating the Czech Coal Phase-Out : What Drives Inter-Organizational Collaboration?
OCELÍK, Petr, Tomáš DIVIÁK, Lukáš LEHOTSKÝ, Kamila SVOBODOVÁ, Markéta HENDRYCHOVÁ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Facilitating the Czech Coal Phase-Out : What Drives Inter-Organizational Collaboration?
Authors
OCELÍK, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Tomáš DIVIÁK (203 Czech Republic), Lukáš LEHOTSKÝ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Kamila SVOBODOVÁ (203 Czech Republic) and Markéta HENDRYCHOVÁ (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
Society & Natural Resources, Philadelphia, Taylor & Francis, 2022, 0894-1920
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50601 Political science
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.500
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14230/22:00125773
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
UT WoS
000790280600001
Keywords in English
Advocacy Coalition Framework; coal phase-out; energy transition; exponential random graph models; mixed methods; policy process
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 14/2/2023 13:36, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
Abstract
V originále
Responses to current environmental challenges, such as the energy transition, require collaboration among diverse actors interacting in complex and conflicting policy settings. This study examines the drivers of inter-organizational collaboration within the conflictual context of Czech coal phase-out by investigating hypotheses on belief homophily, political influence, and expert information. It uses a sequential mixed-methods research design combining exponential random graph modeling, which controls for network self-organization processes, and directed qualitative content analysis, which validates and extends the findings from the previous stage. The results show that organizations perceived as influential and organizations providing expertise are more likely to be involved in inter-organizational collaboration. Belief homophily does not predict collaboration but is relevant for disincentivizing collaboration among actors with low-compatible beliefs, thus contributing to conflict reproduction. The study concludes that future collaborative arrangements need to avoid such design flaws as those of the recently established Coal Committee, which reinforced existing power asymmetries and conflicts.
Links
MUNI/A/1240/2021, interní kód MU |
|