MORARU, Madalina Bianca. The European Court of Justice shaping the right to be heard for asylum seekers, returnees, and visa applicants : an exercise in judicial diplomacy. European Journal of Legal Studies. 2022, vol. 14, Special Issue, p. 21-61. ISSN 1973-2937. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2022.002.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The European Court of Justice shaping the right to be heard for asylum seekers, returnees, and visa applicants : an exercise in judicial diplomacy
Authors MORARU, Madalina Bianca (642 Romania, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition European Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, 1973-2937.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50501 Law
Country of publisher Italy
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW Open access časopisu
Impact factor Impact factor: 0.600
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/22:00125842
Organization unit Faculty of Law
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2022.002
UT WoS 000803308700002
Keywords in English Court of Justice of the European Union; preliminary reference procedure; right to be heard; EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; general principles of EU law; visas; asylum; immigration; return procedures; remedies
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Changed: 23/2/2023 12:49.
Abstract
This article analyses a decade of jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU, the Court) to show how the Court has shaped asylum seekers' and immigrants' right to be heard and to determine the added value of its jurisprudence to the protection of the right to be heard at EU and domestic levels. The article asks whether the CJEU has developed a specific conception of this right and whether this conception aligns with any of the existing scholarly characterisations of the CJEU's approach to migration: activism, passivism, idiosyncratic, or favouring the interpretation of governments or referring courts. The article finds that, taken together, the CJEU's judgments have shed light on the scope of application of the right to be heard and enhanced the overall protection of this right for asylum seekers, returnees, and visa applicants by crafting common standards of when and how to hear individuals and by delimitating tasks between administrative authorities and courts. The CJEU has thus filled significant gaps in EU secondary legislation on the protection of the right to be heard; established good conduct principles for administrative hearings; and empowered domestic courts to ensure the legal accountability of the executive and effective remedies for third-country nationals. Nevertheless, the domestic implementation of the right to be heard, as shaped by the CJEU, is still incoherent.
Links
MUNI/J/0815/2021, interní kód MUName: The Role of Courts in Shaping Migrants' Rights (Acronym: REFORM)
Investor: Masaryk University, MASH JUNIOR - MUNI Award In Science and Humanities JUNIOR
PrintDisplayed: 24/6/2024 20:47