VINCZE, Attila and Nóra CHRONOWSKI. Decision 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB – Constitutional Self-identity of Hungary. In F Gárdos-Orosz - K Zakariás. The main lines of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2021, p. 441-458. The main lines of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court. ISBN 978-3-8487-8561-2. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748929826-441.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Decision 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB – Constitutional Self-identity of Hungary
Name in Czech Rozhodnutí 22/2016. (XII. 5.) AB - Ústavní identita Maďarska
Authors VINCZE, Attila (348 Hungary, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Nóra CHRONOWSKI (348 Hungary).
Edition Baden-Baden, The main lines of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, p. 441-458, 18 pp. The main lines of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, 2021.
Publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Chapter(s) of a specialized book
Field of Study 50501 Law
Country of publisher Germany
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/21:00125865
Organization unit Faculty of Law
ISBN 978-3-8487-8561-2
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748929826-441
Keywords (in Czech) ústavní identita; Maďarsko; Ústavní soud; Evropská unie; soudní dialog
Keywords in English constitutional identity; Hungary; Constitutional Court; European Union; judicial dialogue
Tags International impact
Changed by Changed by: PD Dr. Attila Vincze, LL.M., učo 247258. Changed: 18/1/2023 16:51.
Abstract
The chapter critically analyzes a Decision of the Hungarian Constitutional Court on the national constitutional identity and its role limiting the supremacy of EU law. It also offers a critical account of the judicial dialogue topic.
Abstract (in Czech)
Kapitola kriticky analyzuje rozhodnutí maďarského ústavního soudu o národní ústavní identitě a její roli při omezování nadřazenosti práva EU. Nabízí také kritický popis tématu soudního dialogu.
PrintDisplayed: 9/10/2024 05:28