Detailed Information on Publication Record
2022
Challenges in lower limb lymphoedema assessment based on limb volume change: Lessons learnt from the SENTIX prospective multicentre study
BORČINOVÁ, Martina, Volker RAGOSCH, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ, Sylva BAJSOVÁ, Radovan PILKA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Challenges in lower limb lymphoedema assessment based on limb volume change: Lessons learnt from the SENTIX prospective multicentre study
Authors
BORČINOVÁ, Martina (203 Czech Republic), Volker RAGOSCH, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Sylva BAJSOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Radovan PILKA (203 Czech Republic), Ariel GLICKMAN, Sonia GARRIDO-MALLACH, Francesco RASPAGLIESI, Wiktor SZATKOWSKI, Maja PAKIZ, Leon C SNYMAN, Roman KOCIÁN (203 Czech Republic), Karl TAMUSSINO, Vladimír KALIST, Martin MICHAL (203 Czech Republic), Myriam Gracia SEGOVIA, Robert POKA, Barbara KIPP, Grzegorz SZEWCZYK, Dariusz WYDRA, Róbert TÓTH, Alla VINNYTSKA, Daniela FISCHEROVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Kathrin SIEGLER and David CIBULA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
Gynecologic Oncology, SAN DIEGO, ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2022, 0090-8258
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.700
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/22:00126156
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000739385200012
Keywords in English
Lower limb lymphedema; Limb volume change; Transient edema; Assessment standardisation; Cervical cancer
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 28/6/2022 14:14, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Background. Lower limb lymphoedema (LLL) is the most disabling adverse effect of surgical staging of pelvic lymph nodes. However, the lack of standardisation of volumetric LLL assessment hinders direct comparison between the studies and makes LLL reporting unreliable. The aim of our study is to report outcomes from a prospective trial that have implications for LLL assessment standardisation. Methods. In the prospective international multicentre trial SENTIX, a group of 150 patients with stage IA1-IB2 cervical cancer treated by uterine surgery with bilateral sentinel lymph node biopsy was prospectively evaluated by objective LLL assessment, based on limb volume change (LVC) using circumferrential limb measurements and subjective patient-reported swelling. The assessments were conducted in six-month periods over 24 months post-surgery. Results. Patient LVC substantially fluctuated in both positive and negative directions, which were comparable in frequency up to +/- 14% change. Thirty-eight patients experienced persistent LVC increase >10% classified as LLL, with nine months median time to onset. Some 34.2% of cases experienced onset later than one year after the surgery. Thirty-three patients (22%) experienced transient oedema characterised as LVC >10%, which resolved without intervention between two consequent follow-up visits. No significant correlation between LVC >10% and a patient-reported swelling was observed. Conclusions. Given that we observed comparable fluctuations of the the lower-limb volumes after surgical treatment of cervical cancer in both positive and negative direction up to +/- 14%, the diagnostic threshold for LLL diagnosis based on LVC should be increased to >15% LVC. The distinction of transient oedema from persistent LLL requires repeated measurements. Also, as one-third of LLL cases are diagnosed >1-year post-surgery, a sufficient follow-up duration needs to be ensured. Patient-reported swelling correlated poorly with LVC and should only be used as an adjunct to objective LLL assessment.