C 2022

Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 in the Czech Application Practice: Little Experience but High Expectation

KYSELOVSKÁ, Tereza and Martin KORNEL

Basic information

Original name

Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 in the Czech Application Practice: Little Experience but High Expectation

Authors

KYSELOVSKÁ, Tereza (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Martin KORNEL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Madrid, Cross-Border Couples Property Regimes in Action Before Courts Understanding the EU Regulations 1103/2016 And 1104/2016 in Practice, p. 129-140, 12 pp. EU-FamPro CaseBook, 2022

Publisher

Dykinson, S.L.

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Field of Study

50501 Law

Country of publisher

Spain

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Publication form

electronic version available online

References:

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/22:00126207

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

ISBN

978-84-1122-507-6

Keywords (in Czech)

České mezinárodní právo soukromé; kolizní normy pro manželský majetkový režim; Regulation (EU) 2016/1103

Keywords in English

Czech family private international law; Czech conflict-of-laws rules for matrimonial property regimes; Czech PILA; Regulation (EU) 2016/1103; Matrimonial property regimes

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/7/2024 07:36, Mgr. Martin Kornel, Ph.D.

Abstract

V originále

In our paper, we will first provide a general outline of the Czech family private international law with particular regard to the matrimonial property regimes. Then we will comment on Czech court rulings with legal bases in the Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 in the matter of matrimonial property regimes. Our findings in this respect are limited by the fact that not all Czech court’s rulings are published. Only the Czech Constitutional Court and Supreme Court publish all their rulings. Lower courts’ rulings are currently published only exceptionally. Thus, we are commenting on only two court rulings explicitly referring to the Regulation (EU) 2016/1103. Then we point out theoretical and practical questions connected to matrimonial property regimes that arose in connection with the Re the Regulation (EU) 2016/1103. The Czech Republic did not declare its wish to participate in enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships established by Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1104. Therefore, we are not providing any information in this respect.