KYSELOVSKÁ, Tereza and Martin KORNEL. Regulation (Eu) 2016/1103 in the Czech Application Practice: Little Experience but High Expectation. Online. In M. J. Cazorla Gonzales and L. Ruggeri. Cross-Border Couples Property Regimes in Action Before Courts Understanding the EU Regulations 1103/2016 And 1104/2016 in Practice. Madrid: Dykinson, S.L., 2022, p. 129-140. EU-FamPro CaseBook. ISBN 978-84-1122-507-6.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Regulation (Eu) 2016/1103 in the Czech Application Practice: Little Experience but High Expectation
Authors KYSELOVSKÁ, Tereza (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Martin KORNEL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Madrid, Cross-Border Couples Property Regimes in Action Before Courts Understanding the EU Regulations 1103/2016 And 1104/2016 in Practice, p. 129-140, 12 pp. EU-FamPro CaseBook, 2022.
Publisher Dykinson, S.L.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Chapter(s) of a specialized book
Field of Study 50501 Law
Country of publisher Spain
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form electronic version available online
WWW Open access knihy
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/22:00126207
Organization unit Faculty of Law
ISBN 978-84-1122-507-6
Keywords (in Czech) České mezinárodní právo soukromé; kolizní normy pro manželský majetkový režim; Regulation (EU) 2016/1103
Keywords in English Czech family private international law; Czech conflict-of-laws rules for matrimonial property regimes; Czech PILA; Regulation (EU) 2016/1103; Matrimonial property regimes
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Changed: 28/2/2023 13:36.
Abstract
In our paper, we will first provide a general outline of the Czech family private international law with particular regard to the matrimonial property regimes. Then we will comment on Czech court rulings with legal bases in the Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 in the matter of matrimonial property regimes. Our findings in this respect are limited by the fact that not all Czech court’s rulings are published. Only the Czech Constitutional Court and Supreme Court publish all their rulings. Lower courts’ rulings are currently published only exceptionally. Thus, we are commenting on only two court rulings explicitly referring to the Regulation (EU) 2016/1103. Then we point out theoretical and practical questions connected to matrimonial property regimes that arose in connection with the Re the Regulation (EU) 2016/1103. The Czech Republic did not declare its wish to participate in enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships established by Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1104. Therefore, we are not providing any information in this respect.
PrintDisplayed: 17/5/2024 17:54