Detailed Information on Publication Record
2022
Impact of BCR::ABL1 transcript type on RT-qPCR amplification performance and molecular response to therapy
SALMON, M., H. E. WHITE, Hana ZIZKOVA, A. GOTTSCHALK, Eliska MOTLOVA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Impact of BCR::ABL1 transcript type on RT-qPCR amplification performance and molecular response to therapy
Authors
SALMON, M., H. E. WHITE, Hana ZIZKOVA (203 Czech Republic), A. GOTTSCHALK, Eliska MOTLOVA (203 Czech Republic), N. CERVEIRA, D. COLOMER, D. CORIU, G. N. FRANKE, E. GOTTARDI, B. IZZO, Tomáš JURČEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), T. LION, V. SCHAFER, C. VENTURI, P. VIGNERI, M. ZAWADA, Jan ZUNA (203 Czech Republic), Lenka HOVORKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Jitka KOBLIHOVA (203 Czech Republic), Hana KLAMOVA (203 Czech Republic), Marketa MARKOVA STASTNA (203 Czech Republic), Dana SRBOVA (203 Czech Republic), Adela BENESOVA (203 Czech Republic), Vaclava POLIVKOVA, Daniela ŽÁČKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří MAYER (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), I. ROEDER, I. GLAUCHE, T. ERNST, A. HOCHHAUS, K. M. POLAKOVA and N. C. P. CROSS (guarantor)
Edition
Leukemia, LONDON, Springer, 2022, 0887-6924
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30205 Hematology
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 11.400
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/22:00126254
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000807908400001
Keywords in English
Cancer genetics; Myeloproliferative disease
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 14/7/2022 09:25, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Several studies have reported that chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients expressing e14a2 BCR::ABL1 have a faster molecular response to therapy compared to patients expressing e13a2. To explore the reason for this difference we undertook a detailed technical comparison of the commonly used Europe Against Cancer (EAC) BCR::ABL1 reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay in European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) reference laboratories (n = 10). We found the amplification ratio of the e13a2 amplicon was 38% greater than e14a2 (p = 0.015), and the amplification efficiency was 2% greater (P = 0.17). This subtle difference led to measurable transcript-type dependent variation in estimates of residual disease which could be corrected by (i) taking the qPCR amplification efficiency into account, (ii) using alternative RT-qPCR approaches or (iii) droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a technique which is relatively insensitive to differences in amplification kinetics. In CML patients, higher levels of BCR::ABL1/GUSB were identified at diagnosis for patients expressing e13a2 (n = 67) compared to e14a2 (n = 78) when analysed by RT-qPCR (P = 0.0005) but not ddPCR (P = 0.5). These data indicate that widely used RT-qPCR assays result in subtly different estimates of disease depending on BCR::ABL1 transcript type; these differences are small but may need to be considered for optimal patient management.