Detailed Information on Publication Record
2022
Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
ANTONIOU, V., C. H. DAVOS, E. KAPRELI, Ladislav BAŤALÍK, D.B. PANAGIOTAKOS et. al.Basic information
Original name
Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
ANTONIOU, V., C. H. DAVOS, E. KAPRELI, Ladislav BAŤALÍK (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), D.B. PANAGIOTAKOS and G. PEPERA (guarantor)
Edition
Journal of Clinical Medicine, Basel, MDPI, 2022, 2077-0383
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30304 Public and environmental health
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.900
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/22:00126310
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000824511200001
Keywords in English
wearable sensors; home-based cardiac rehabilitation; cardiovascular disease; cardiorespiratory fitness; accelerometer; physical activity
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 16/1/2023 12:13, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a highly recommended intervention towards the advancement of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients' health profile; though with low participation rates. Although home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) with the use of wearable sensors is proposed as a feasible alternative rehabilitation model, further investigation is needed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of wearable sensors-assisted HBCR in improving the CVD patients' cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health profile. PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from 2010 to January 2022, using relevant keywords. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials, written in English, comparing wearable sensors-assisted HBCR to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) or usual care (UC), were included. Wearable sensors-assisted HBCR significantly improved CRF when compared to CBCR (Hedges' g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06, 0.39; I-2 = 0%; p = 0.01), whilst comparison of HBCR to UC revealed a nonsignificant effect (Hedges' g = 0.87, 95% CI -0.87, 1.85; I-2 = 96.41%; p = 0.08). Effects on physical activity, quality of life, depression levels, modification of cardiovascular risk factors/laboratory parameters, and adherence were synthesized narratively. No significant differences were noted. Technology tools are growing fast in the cardiac rehabilitation era and promote exercise-based interventions into a more home-based setting. Wearable-assisted HBCR presents the potential to act as an adjunct or an alternative to CBCR.