Detailed Information on Publication Record
2022
Comparison of CNN-Learned vs. Handcrafted Features for Detection of Parkinson's Disease Dysgraphia in a Multilingual Dataset
GALAZ, Zoltan, Peter DROTAR, Jiri MEKYSKA, Matej GAZDA, Jan MUCHA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Comparison of CNN-Learned vs. Handcrafted Features for Detection of Parkinson's Disease Dysgraphia in a Multilingual Dataset
Authors
GALAZ, Zoltan, Peter DROTAR, Jiri MEKYSKA, Matej GAZDA, Jan MUCHA, Vojtech ZVONCAK, Zdenek SMEKAL, Marcos FAUNDEZ-ZANUY, Reinel CASTRILLON, Juan Rafael OROZCO-ARROYAVE, Steven RAPCSAK, Tamas KINCSES, Luboš BRABENEC (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Irena REKTOROVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Lausanne, Frontiers Media SA, 2022, 1662-5196
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30103 Neurosciences
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.500
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14740/22:00129679
Organization unit
Central European Institute of Technology
UT WoS
000811334000001
Keywords in English
machine learning; deep learning; feature extraction; Parkinson's disease dysgraphia; handwriting analysis
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 19/8/2022 12:34, Mgr. Pavla Foltynová, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
Parkinson's disease dysgraphia (PDYS), one of the earliest signs of Parkinson's disease (PD), has been researched as a promising biomarker of PD and as the target of a noninvasive and inexpensive approach to monitoring the progress of the disease. However, although several approaches to supportive PDYS diagnosis have been proposed (mainly based on handcrafted features (HF) extracted from online handwriting or the utilization of deep neural networks), it remains unclear which approach provides the highest discrimination power and how these approaches can be transferred between different datasets and languages. This study aims to compare classification performance based on two types of features: features automatically extracted by a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) and HF designed by human experts. Both approaches are evaluated on a multilingual dataset collected from 143 PD patients and 151 healthy controls in the Czech Republic, United States, Colombia, and Hungary. The subjects performed the spiral drawing task (SDT; a language-independent task) and the sentence writing task (SWT; a language-dependent task). Models based on logistic regression and gradient boosting were trained in several scenarios, specifically single language (SL), leave one language out (LOLO), and all languages combined (ALC). We found that the HF slightly outperformed the CNN-extracted features in all considered evaluation scenarios for the SWT. In detail, the following balanced accuracy (BACC) scores were achieved: SL-0.65 (HF), 0.58 (CNN); LOLO-0.65 (HF), 0.57 (CNN); and ALC-0.69 (HF), 0.66 (CNN). However, in the case of the SDT, features extracted by a CNN provided competitive results: SL-0.66 (HF), 0.62 (CNN); LOLO-0.56 (HF), 0.54 (CNN); and ALC-0.60 (HF), 0.60 (CNN). In summary, regarding the SWT, the HF outperformed the CNN-extracted features over 6% (mean BACC of 0.66 for HF, and 0.60 for CNN). In the case of the SDT, both feature sets provided almost identical classification performance (mean BACC of 0.60 for HF, and 0.58 for CNN).
Links
NU20-04-00294, research and development project |
| ||
734718, interní kód MU |
|