Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{2222494,
author = {Attia, Sameh and Austermann, Thomas and May, Andreas and Mekhemar, Mohamed and Conrad, Jonas and Knitschke, Michael and Böttger, Sebastian and HansandPeter, Howaldt and Riad, Abanoub},
article_location = {London},
article_number = {1},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1},
keywords = {Computed-controlled local anesthesia; Dental anesthesia; Dental education; Local anesthesia; Nerve block; Pain perception; RCT; Split-mouth},
language = {eng},
issn = {1472-6831},
journal = {BMC Oral Health},
title = {Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial},
url = {https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1},
volume = {22},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 2222494
AU - Attia, Sameh - Austermann, Thomas - May, Andreas - Mekhemar, Mohamed - Conrad, Jonas - Knitschke, Michael - Böttger, Sebastian - Hans-Peter, Howaldt - Riad, Abanoub
PY - 2022
TI - Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial
JF - BMC Oral Health
VL - 22
IS - 1
SP - 1-13
EP - 1-13
PB - BMC
SN - 14726831
KW - Computed-controlled local anesthesia
KW - Dental anesthesia
KW - Dental education
KW - Local anesthesia
KW - Nerve block
KW - Pain perception
KW - RCT
KW - Split-mouth
UR - https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1
N2 - Background The administration of local anesthesia (LA) in dental practice requires an injection which is the leading cause of patients' fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled local anesthetic injector, designed to reduce the pain of performing local anesthesia by controlling the speed of injection. This single-blind randomised control trial aimed to compare the pain perception after computer-controlled local anesthesia (CCLA) and conventional LA. Methods Dental students were both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as additional operator of the LA. Data were collected regarding gender, age, medical condition, smoking habits. Additionally, operator feedback about the handling, pain at insertion and during infiltration, excitement (Dental Anxiety Scale), and complications were assessed. Results Out of the 60 included participants, the majority were females (n = 41; 68.3%), medically healthy (n = 54; 90%), and did not receive medications (n = 54; 90%). While the participating students administered 62 (51.7%) injections, the experienced dentist administered 58 (48.3%) injections. The difference in pain perception on puncture between CCLA and conventional injections was not statistically significant (Sig. = 0.285); however, pain perception during injection was significantly different (Sig. = 0.029) between CCLA (1.65 +/- 1.93) and conventional injections (2.49 +/- 2.31). Conclusion The professional experience influenced the pain perception while applying the LA. CCLA did not reduce pain on puncture significantly; however, pain perception during the injection was significantly reduced in the case of using CCLA devices compared to the conventional syringe.
ER -
ATTIA, Sameh, Thomas AUSTERMANN, Andreas MAY, Mohamed MEKHEMAR, Jonas CONRAD, Michael KNITSCHKE, Sebastian BÖTTGER, Howaldt HANS-PETER and Abanoub RIAD. Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial. \textit{BMC Oral Health}. London: BMC, 2022, vol.~22, No~1, p.~1-13. ISSN~1472-6831. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1.
|
