LANGAUFOVÁ, Alena, Tereza FRIESSOVÁ, Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ, David SANDERS, Maciej PAWLAK, Andrew DE BAUX, Barbora EAST and Miloslav KLUGAR. Developing European Hernia Society (EHS) Guideline on Incisional Hernia: methodological aspects of de-novo semi adolopment apporach. In GIN 2022, Toronto. 2022.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Developing European Hernia Society (EHS) Guideline on Incisional Hernia: methodological aspects of de-novo semi adolopment apporach
Authors LANGAUFOVÁ, Alena, Tereza FRIESSOVÁ, Simona SLEZÁKOVÁ, David SANDERS, Maciej PAWLAK, Andrew DE BAUX, Barbora EAST and Miloslav KLUGAR.
Edition GIN 2022, Toronto, 2022.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Conference abstract
Field of Study 30212 Surgery
Country of publisher Canada
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Keywords in English Surgery; incisional hernia; guideline
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Bc. Alena Langaufová, Ph.D., učo 63919. Changed: 10/10/2022 13:12.
Abstract
Background There are no guidelines on the management of incisional hernias produced with a robust methodology, which was confirmed by a systematic search and AGREE II assessment of existing guidelines. Thus, a de-novo guideline with semi adolopment approach was developed. Objective This project aims to develop a trustworthy and robust clinical practice guideline describing the best management of incisional hernia, building on evidence retrieved mostly from systematic reviews and updated for the newest scientific evidence. Methods and future prospects Hernia surgeons from universities, public and private facilities from European countries were invited to be part of the project. Fifteen working groups were established for each clinical question. Patients representatives were included to help with scoring the importance of outcomes. We organized online teaching sessions to educate the guideline team on the methodology. A skilled information specialist carried out a systematic search on three levels; 1. search for guidelines and systematic reviews (SRs); 2. search for primary studies informed by gaps in the retrieved SRs; 3. hand search. Retrieved SRs informed the search strategy for primary studies. Newly identified primary studies were pooled together with studies from SRs, if available. Risk of Bias assessment and data extraction was done de-novo for all included studies by two independent methodologists. The certainty of evidence and recommendations were developed using GRADE methodology.
PrintDisplayed: 22/8/2024 09:07