J 2022

Recognising bias in Common Era temperature reconstructions

BÜNTGEN, Ulf, Dominique ARSENEAULT, Etienne BOUCHER, Olga V. CHURAKOVA SIDOROVA, Fabio GENNARETTI et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Recognising bias in Common Era temperature reconstructions

Authors

BÜNTGEN, Ulf (276 Germany, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Dominique ARSENEAULT, Etienne BOUCHER, Olga V. CHURAKOVA SIDOROVA, Fabio GENNARETTI, Alan CRIVELLARO, Malcolm K. HUGHES, Alexander V. KIRDYANOV, Lara KLIPPEL, Paul J. KRUSIC, Hans W. LINDERHOLM, Fredrik C. LJUNGQVIST, Josef LUDESCHER, Michael MCCORMICK, Vladimir S. MYGLAN, Kurt NICOLUSSI, Alma PIERMATTEI, Clive OPPENHEIMER, Frederick REINIG, Michael SIGL, Eugene A. VAGANOV and Jan ESPER

Edition

Dendrochronologia, Munich, Elsevier GmbH, 2022, 1125-7865

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10500 1.5. Earth and related environmental sciences

Country of publisher

Germany

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.000

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/22:00127303

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

UT WoS

000826976900002

Keywords in English

Climate variation; Common Era; IPCC; Large-scale network; Multi -proxy reconstruction; Science communication; Tree rings

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 30/11/2022 15:35, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.

Abstract

V originále

A steep decline in the quality and quantity of available climate proxy records before medieval times challenges any comparison of reconstructed temperature and hydroclimate trends and extremes between the first and second half of the Common Era. Understanding of the physical causes, ecological responses and societal consequences of past climatic changes, however, demands highly-resolved, spatially-explicit, seasonally-defined and absolutely-dated archives over the entire period in question. Continuous efforts to improve existing proxy records and reconstruction methods and to develop new ones, as well as clear communication of all uncertainties (within and beyond academia) must be central tasks for the paleoclimate community.