ŠPELDA, Daniel. Collective empiricism at the Paris Observatoire in the late seventeenth century. The seventeenth century. 2022, vol. 37, No 6, p. 977-1007. ISSN 0268-117X. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2022.2106295.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Collective empiricism at the Paris Observatoire in the late seventeenth century
Authors ŠPELDA, Daniel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition The seventeenth century, 2022, 0268-117X.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 60301 Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 0.300
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/22:00129262
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2022.2106295
UT WoS 000841841600001
Keywords in English Jean-Dominique Cassini; Tycho Brahe; Paris Observatoire; collective empiricism; early modern astronomy
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. et Mgr. Stanislav Hasil, učo 415267. Changed: 15/2/2023 14:20.
Abstract
This article discusses the epistemic practices developed by astronomers at the Paris Observatoire in the late seventeenth century. It compares their approach with the research carried out by Tycho Brahe at the Uraniborg Observatory about a century earlier. The article will focus on three selected epistemological differences between the research at the Observatoire and at Uraniborg. The first is a different way of founding and legitimating astronomy. Tycho understood astronomical research as part of a humanistic philosophical worldview. Cassini and his colleagues at the Observatoire emphasised the empirical nature of astronomy and its practical utility for the state. The second difference was the collectivisation of knowledge. While Tycho approached research in an individualistic way, the astronomers from the Observatoire stressed the importance of collective and coordinated collaboration. The third change was the institutionalisation of science in the context of the administration of the modern absolutist state, which provided research with long-term continuity. The article shows that the practice of collective empiricism connected the astronomers of Paris with other empirical science representatives throughout Europe.
Links
GA20-01948S, research and development projectName: Idea vědeckého pokroku v raném osvícenství (1684-1740): Fontenelle a jeho současníci (Acronym: IVPRO-FAJS)
Investor: Czech Science Foundation
PrintDisplayed: 27/7/2024 14:05