Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Addressing inconsistencies in Cyperaceae and Juncaceae taxonomy: Comment on Brožová et al. (2022)
ELLIOTT, Tammy L, Isabel LARRIDON, Russell L. BARRETT, Jeremy J. BRUHL, Suzana M. COSTA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Addressing inconsistencies in Cyperaceae and Juncaceae taxonomy: Comment on Brožová et al. (2022)
Authors
ELLIOTT, Tammy L (124 Canada, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Isabel LARRIDON, Russell L. BARRETT, Jeremy J. BRUHL, Suzana M. COSTA, Marcial ESCUDERO, Andrew L. HIPP, Pedro JIMÉNEZ‐MEJÍAS, Jan KIRSCHNER, Modesto LUCEÑO, José Ignacio MÁRQUEZ-CORRO, Santiago MARTÍN-BRAVO, Eric H. ROALSON, Ilias SEMMOURI, Daniel SPALINK, William Wayt THOMAS, Tamara VILLAVERDE, Karen L. WILSON and Muthama A. MUASYA
Edition
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Academic Press Inc. 2023, 1055-7903
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.100 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/23:00130175
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000914365500001
Keywords in English
Classification; Cyperaceae; Juncaceae; Molecular phylogenetics; Plant systematics; Taxonomy
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 25/4/2023 15:48, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
Brožová et al. (2022) present a study, “Toward finally unraveling the phylogenetic relationships of Juncaceae with respect to another cyperid family, Cyperaceae”, with the premise of revising the phylogenetic relationships in Juncaceae and Cyperaceae based on Sanger sequencing of one nuclear rDNA (ITS) and two plastid regions (the gene rbcL and the spacer trnL-F). While the paper highlights the need for ongoing taxonomic revision in Juncaceae, we are concerned that their analyses and conclusions could lead to nomenclatural instability and unnecessary confusion among researchers, particularly those working in cyperids (Cyperaceae, Juncaceae and Thurniaceae) and closely allied monocot lineages. Our concerns stem from the use of incomplete datasets and the failure to integrate recently published taxonomic literature. As a result, the systematic conclusions drawn by the authors are outdated and conflict with previous studies based on more complete phylogenomic datasets (e.g., Larridon et al., 2021), leading to unjustifiable (i.e., proposed recognition of non-monophyletic genera) and superfluous (i.e., already completed nomenclatural changes) recommendations.