OLECKA, Ivana, Martin DOBIAS, Adela LEMROVA, Katerina IVANOVA, Tomas FURST, Jan KRAJSA and Petr HANDLOS. Indeterminacy of the Diagnosis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Leading to Problems with the Validity of Data. Diagnostics. Basel: MDPI, 2022, vol. 12, No 7, p. 1-17. ISSN 2075-4418. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071512.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Indeterminacy of the Diagnosis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Leading to Problems with the Validity of Data
Authors OLECKA, Ivana (203 Czech Republic), Martin DOBIAS (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Adela LEMROVA (203 Czech Republic), Katerina IVANOVA (203 Czech Republic), Tomas FURST (203 Czech Republic), Jan KRAJSA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Petr HANDLOS (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Diagnostics, Basel, MDPI, 2022, 2075-4418.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30501 Forensic science
Country of publisher Switzerland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.600
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/22:00128172
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071512
UT WoS 000831710400001
Keywords in English death; infant; infection; injury; sudden; SIDS; suffocations; unexpected; validity of data; violent
Tags 14110111, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 20/1/2023 13:31.
Abstract
The validity of infant mortality data is essential in assessing health care quality and in the setting of preventive measures. This study explores different diagnostic procedures used to determine the cause of death across forensic settings and thus the issue of the reduced validity of data. All records from three forensic medical departments that conducted autopsies on children aged 12 months or younger (n = 204) who died during the years 2007-2016 in Moravia were included. Differences in diagnostic procedures were found to be statistically significant. Each department works with a different set of risk factors and places different emphasis on different types of examination. The most significant differences could be observed in sudden infant death syndrome and suffocation diagnosis frequency. The validity of statistical data on the causes of infant mortality is thus significantly reduced. Therefore, the possibilities of public health and social policy interventions toward preventing sudden and unexpected infant death are extraordinarily complicated by this lack of data validity.
PrintDisplayed: 21/7/2024 16:30