DZURILLOVÁ, Zuzana and Markéta KULHÁNKOVÁ. The Historical Present in the Grottaferrata and Escorial Versions of Digenis Akritis : A Narratological Insight. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies. 2022, vol. 62, No 3, p. 365-384. ISSN 0017-3916.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The Historical Present in the Grottaferrata and Escorial Versions of Digenis Akritis : A Narratological Insight
Authors DZURILLOVÁ, Zuzana (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution) and Markéta KULHÁNKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 2022, 0017-3916.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 60206 Specific literatures
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 0.200
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/22:00128209
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
UT WoS 000923604100007
Keywords in English Greek narrative; Byzantine poetry; narratology; historical present tense; Digenis Akritis
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. et Mgr. Stanislav Hasil, učo 415267. Changed: 31/3/2023 16:22.
Abstract
“Digenis Akritis” well known as the only representative of genuinely Byzantine heroic poetry. This study focuses on the two oldest versions of the poem (Grottaferrata and Escorial) and provides a comparative analysis of their use of the so-called historical present tense, which is a generally neglected topic in the study of Byzantine literature. We distinguish between the diegetic type of the device, which is used in both versions, and the mimetic type which occurs in scenic narrative and is frequently used in the E version. Additionally, we recognize a ‘connective’ function of the diegetic HP used in formulas in the E version. The study of the historical present tense helps us to see more clearly the differences in the overall narrative technique of these two version: G recounts events with a larger degree of distance and abstraction. Its sparse use of the HP corresponds with authoritative written discourse. In E, on the other hand, the abundant use in scenic narratives of HPs with an immersive function provides more detailed, visualizing, and engaging descriptions of events.
Links
GA19-05387S, research and development projectName: Naratologický komentář k byzantskému eposu Digenis Akritis (Acronym: A Narratological Commentary on Digenis Akritis)
Investor: Czech Science Foundation
MUNI/IGA/1405/2020, interní kód MUName: The Historical Present Tense in the Grottaferrata and Escorial versions of Digenis Akritis
Investor: Masaryk University
PrintDisplayed: 27/4/2024 01:41