Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Condifentiality of Arbitral Awards on National, International and Institutional Level
HODERMARSKY, Jan and Vlastislav STAVINOHABasic information
Original name
Condifentiality of Arbitral Awards on National, International and Institutional Level
Authors
HODERMARSKY, Jan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Vlastislav STAVINOHA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
1. vyd. Brno, Cofola International 2021: Current Challenges of Resolution of International (Cross-Border) Disputes, p. 300-331, 32 pp. 2023
Publisher
Masaryk University
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Stať ve sborníku
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/23:00130245
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
ISBN
978-80-280-0230-5
ISSN
UT WoS
001062677700012
Keywords in English
Confidentiality in Arbitration; Arbitral Award Confidentiality; Decisional Coherency; Confidentiality in National and International Law; Confidentiality in Institutional Rules; Interest for Publication of Arbitration Awards
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 5/4/2024 16:01, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Abstract
V originále
Confidentiality of arbitration is told to be one of the reasons why parties actually choose to arbitrate. The question of whether the arbitral award should remain confidential is however not unified across different jurisdictions. The regulation of this matter varies even when it comes to rules of various arbitration tribunals. Some jurisdictions consider the confidentiality of arbitral award to be an implied obligation derived from the very nature of arbitral process. This article analyses the legal regulation of confidentiality of arbitral awards on various levels while the importance of the publication is presented in the context of the lack of decisional coherence in international arbitration. Further, the resolution of potential conflict of the regulations is analysed. There are good reasons for making awards publicly available. Considering the information society of the 21st century, the fact that the publication of awards is regulated differently in different jurisdictions is a hindrance of parties’ legal certainty.