Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Tele-Assessment of Functional Capacity through the Six-Minute Walk Test in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2: Validity and Reliability of Repeated Measurements
PEPERA, Garyfallia, Evmorfia KARANASIOU, Christina BLIOUMPA, Varsamo ANTONIOU, Konstantinos KALATZIS et. al.Basic information
Original name
Tele-Assessment of Functional Capacity through the Six-Minute Walk Test in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2: Validity and Reliability of Repeated Measurements
Authors
PEPERA, Garyfallia, Evmorfia KARANASIOU, Christina BLIOUMPA, Varsamo ANTONIOU, Konstantinos KALATZIS, Leonidas LANARAS and Ladislav BAŤALÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Sensors, Basel, MDPI, 2023, 1424-8220
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30304 Public and environmental health
Country of publisher
Switzerland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.900 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130467
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000930074800001
Keywords in English
tele-assessment; remote assessment; telehealth assessment; functional capacity; diabetes mellitus; six-minute walk test
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 26/1/2024 11:21, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
A tele-assessed 6MWT (TL 6MWT) could be an alternative method of evaluating functional capacity in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a TL 6MWT. The functional capacity of 28 patients with DM2 (75% men) aged 61 +/- 13 years was evaluated twice via an indoor, center-based 6MWT (CB 6MWT) and twice outside each patient's home via a web-based platform TL 6MWT. The study showed a high statistically significant correlation between the CB and TL 6MWT (Pearson's r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Reliability testing showed no statistically significant differences in the distance covered (CB1: 492 +/- 84 m and CB2: 506 +/- 86 m versus TL1: 534 +/- 87 m and TL2: 542 +/- 93 m, respectively) and in the best distance of the TL 6MWT (545 +/- 93 m) compared to the best CB distance (521 +/- 83 m). Strong internal reliability for both the CB (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.93) and the TL 6MWT (ICC = 0.98) was found. The results indicate that a TL 6MWT performed outdoors can be a highly valid and reliable tool to assess functional capacity in patients with DM2. No learning effect between the TL and CB assessment was found, minimizing the need for repetition.