Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Measurement Invariance of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire Across 17 Countries
SCHUTTE, Lusilda, Ingrid BRDAR, Marié P WISSING, Marko TONČIĆ, Ulisses ARAUJO et. al.Basic information
Original name
Measurement Invariance of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire Across 17 Countries
Authors
SCHUTTE, Lusilda (guarantor), Ingrid BRDAR, Marié P WISSING, Marko TONČIĆ, Ulisses ARAUJO, Erik CARLQUIST, Alejandro Castro SOLANO, Teresa FREIRE, María del Rocío HERNÁNDEZ-POZO, Paul E JOSE, Tamás MARTOS, Jeanne NAKAMURA, Pamela Nuñez del Prado CHAVES, Pninit RUSSO-NETZER, Kamlesh SINGH, Alena SLEZÁČKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Lawrence SOOSAI-NATHAN, Wenceslao UNANUE, Dianne A VELLA-BRODRICK and Antonella Delle FAVE
Edition
Applied Research in Quality of Life, DORDRECHT, SPRINGER, 2023, 1871-2584
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50101 Psychology
Country of publisher
Netherlands
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.400 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130558
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000989363600002
Keywords in English
Alignment optimization; Cross-cultural measurement invariance; Eudaimonic and Hedonic Happiness Investigation (EHHI); Meaning in Life Questionnaire; Measurement
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 26/1/2024 08:05, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
The Meaning in Life Questionnaire assesses presence of and search for meaning in life. Although the questionnaire has shown promising psychometric properties in samples from different countries, the scale’s measurement invariance across a large number of nations has yet to be assessed. This study is aimed at addressing this gap, providing insight into how meaning in life is constructed and experienced across countries and into the extent to which cross-country comparisons can be made. A total of 3867 adult participants from 17 countries, aged 30–60, balanced by gender, and with at least secondary education, completed the questionnaire as part of the Eudaimonic and Hedonic Happiness Investigation. Single sample confirmatory factor analysis, multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, and alignment optimization were applied to investigate the scale’s performance across the samples. Good psychometric properties and high levels of approximate measurement invariance emerged for the Presence subscale after removal of item 9, the only reverse-phrased item. Performance of the Search subscale varied more across samples, suggesting caution in interpreting related results supporting approximate measurement invariance. The conceptualization of presence of meaning operationalized in the corresponding subscale (without item 9) appears consistent across countries, whereas search for meaning seems to be less universally homogenous and requires further exploration. Moreover, the Meaning in Life Questionnaire does not reflect the conceptual distinction between “purpose” and “meaning” currently acknowledged by researchers. This issue should be further explored in studies addressing the scale’s performance across cultures.