Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Unicuspid Aortic Valve in Patients Undergoing the Ross Procedure
GOFUS, Jan, Petr FILA, Martin VOBORNIK, Jiri ONDRASEK, Petr NĚMEC et. al.Basic information
Original name
Unicuspid Aortic Valve in Patients Undergoing the Ross Procedure
Authors
GOFUS, Jan (203 Czech Republic), Petr FILA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Martin VOBORNIK (203 Czech Republic), Jiri ONDRASEK (203 Czech Republic), Petr NĚMEC (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jan ŠTĚRBA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Eva CERMAKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Martin TUNA (203 Czech Republic) and Jan VOJACEK (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
Annals of Thoracic Surgery, New York, Elsevier Science Inc. 2023, 0003-4975
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.600 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130667
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000944472800001
Keywords in English
Unicuspid Aortic Valve; Ross Procedure
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 27/4/2023 13:31, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
BACKGROUND The prevalence and outcomes of the unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) in patients undergoing the Ross procedure have been strongly underreported in the current literature. We sought to evaluate this in comparison with bicuspid (BAV) and tricuspid valve (TAV) in our Ross cohort.METHODS This was a retrospective observational study of patients undergoing the Ross procedure at 2 dedicated centers between 2009 and 2020. Primary end points were the risks of midterm autograft reoperation and the onset of at least moderate aortic regurgitation during follow-up. The secondary end point was to compare the perioperative out-comes between the groups.RESULTS Included in the analysis were 286 patients, of those 39% with UAV, 52% with BAV, and 9% with TAV. UAV patients were operated on at the youngest age (P < .001) and more often for a combined hemodynamic aortic valve pathology (P = .02). They had the largest aortic root dimensions: annulus (P = .01), Valsalva sinuses (P = .11), sino-tubular junction (P = .001), and ascending aorta (P < .0001). The risks of reoperation (P = .86) and the onset of aortic regurgitation (P = .75) were comparable among the groups over the follow-up of 4.1 years. There was no difference in perioperative outcomes.CONCLUSIONS UAV is a separate unit characterized by a distinct hemodynamic pathology and generated aortopathy. It is not associated with a higher risk of reoperation or new onset of aortic regurgitation after the Ross procedure in the midterm postoperatively. At the current state, UAV remains acceptable for the Ross procedure.