Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
From Minimalism to the Substantive Core and Back: The Slovak Constitutional Court and (the Lack of) Constitutional Identity
ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína and Max STEUERBasic information
Original name
From Minimalism to the Substantive Core and Back: The Slovak Constitutional Court and (the Lack of) Constitutional Identity
Authors
ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína (703 Slovakia, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Max STEUER (703 Slovakia)
Edition
1st. Neuveden, The Jurisprudence of Particularism National Identity Claims in Central Europe, p. 81-104, 24 pp. Bloomsbury Open Access, Hart Publishing 2023, 2023
Publisher
Hart Publishing
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/23:00130672
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
ISBN
978-1-5099-6012-5
Keywords in English
constitutional identity; particularism; constitutional courts; Slovak Constitutional Court
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 9/2/2024 09:25, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Abstract
V originále
The chapter on the SCC hence demonstrates that constitutional courts may develop their reading of constitutional identity in a reactive way. The lack of textual hooks in the text of the Slovak Constitution, combined with experience of political unrest, tradition of judicial minimalism, and dominance of separation of powers disputes in the SCC’s case law, eventually led the court to ground its approach to constitutional identity in the substantive core doctrine. This doctrine represents a reading of constitutional identity which aims at integrating democracy, human rights and the rule of law. We argue that locking in the principle of judicial independence became important both for the SCC’s self-preservation and for its understanding of the threats to the Slovak judiciary in general. Therefore, the government’s attempt to interfere in judicial independence via the security screening of judges spurred the court to quash several provisions of the constitutional act. However, in doing so the SCC also created a space for a pushback from the populist government, which demanded more accountability for the ‘non-democratic’ judiciary by curtailing the court’s formal powers in an accelerated procedure. This is important for the broader literature examining legislative reactions to judicialisation of politics.