J 2023

Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass

BIROŠ, Ernest, Robert STAFFA, Tomáš NOVOTNÝ, Miroslav KREJČÍ, Lukáš VELECKÝ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Long-Term Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Saphenous Vein Harvest for Femoral-to-Popliteal Artery Bypass

Authors

BIROŠ, Ernest (703 Slovakia, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Robert STAFFA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš NOVOTNÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Miroslav KREJČÍ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Lukáš VELECKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Monika SKOTAKOVA (203 Czech Republic)

Edition

INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, NEW DELHI, SPRINGER INDIA, 2023, 0972-2068

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30212 Surgery

Country of publisher

India

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 0.400 in 2022

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130748

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

UT WoS

000960626000003

Keywords in English

Great saphenous vein; Endoscopic vein harvest; Open vein harvest; Femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass; Infrainguinal bypass surgery

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 9/2/2024 14:06, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Abstract

V originále

Application of endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) in infrainguinal bypass surgery generated mixed results. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between endoscopic vein harvest and open vein harvest (OVH) in femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass (FPB). Case series analysis that involved all patients undergoing femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass with single-segment great saphenous vein between January 2012 and December 2017. There were 170 femoral-to-popliteal artery bypasses performed in 168 patients who met the inclusion criteria; 25 (14.7%) in EVH group and 145 (85.3%) in OVH group. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia was an indication for surgery in 60% of EVH patients and 79% of OVH patients (15/25; 60% EVH vs 114/145; 79% OVH; p = .08). Mean follow-up was significantly longer for EVH group (65.71 months EVH vs 45.32 months OVH; p = .003). EVH group had a lower wound complication rate (4/25; 16% EVH vs 45/145; 31% OVH; p = .336), especially at the harvest incision site, despite higher rate of obesity amongst EVH patients (15/25; 60% EVH vs 35/145; 24% OVH; p < .001). The reintervention rate was higher in EVH group (10/25; 40% EVH vs 42/145; 29% OVH; p = .38). At 5 years, primary (69.1% EVH vs 67.0% OVH; p = .85), primary assisted (87.6% EVH vs 73.5% OVH; p = .18), and secondary patency rates (87.3% EVH vs 76.7% OVH; p = .25) did not demonstrate significant differences between the groups. Endoscopic vein harvest for femoral-to-popliteal artery bypass decreased the rate and severity of wound complications, but this difference was statistically insignificant. Obese patients are more suitable for endoscopic vein harvest, with relatively lower chances of developing wound infections. Despite the higher rate of reinterventions, endoscopic vein harvest patency rates were in line with those for the open vein harvest group in up to 5 years of follow-up.