Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Analytic and Holistic Cognitive Style as a Set of Independent Manifests : Evidence from a Validation Study of Six Measurement Instruments
LACKO, David, Tomáš PROŠEK, Jiří ČENĚK, Michaela HELÍSKOVÁ, Pavel UGWITZ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Analytic and Holistic Cognitive Style as a Set of Independent Manifests : Evidence from a Validation Study of Six Measurement Instruments
Authors
LACKO, David (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Tomáš PROŠEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří ČENĚK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Michaela HELÍSKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Pavel UGWITZ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Vojtěch SVOBODA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Peter POČAJI (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Matěj VAIS (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Helena HALÍŘOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Vojtěch JUŘÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Čeněk ŠAŠINKA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
PLOS ONE, UNITED STATES, PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE, 2023, 1932-6203
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50101 Psychology
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.700 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14210/23:00130958
Organization unit
Faculty of Arts
UT WoS
001010596300008
Keywords in English
cognitive styles; analytic and holistic cognitive style; global and local processing; reaction times; validity
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 3/4/2024 14:27, Mgr. et Mgr. Stanislav Hasil
Abstract
V originále
Cognitive styles are commonly studied constructs in cognitive psychology. The theory of field dependence-independence was one of the most important cognitive styles. Yet in the past, its measurement had significant shortcomings in validity and reliability. The theory of analytic and holistic cognitive styles attempted to extend this theory and overcome its shortcomings. Unfortunately, the psychometric properties of its measurement methods were not properly verified. Furthermore, new statistical approaches, such as analysis of reaction times, have been overlooked by current research. The aim of this pre-registered study was to verify the psychometric properties (i.e., factor structure, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity with intelligence and personality, and divergent, concurrent and predictive validity) of several methods routinely applied in the field. We developed/adapted six methods based on self-report questionnaires, rod-and-frame principles, embedded figures, and hierarchical figures. The analysis was conducted on 392 Czech participants, with two data collection waves. The results indicate that the use of methods based on the rod-and-frame principle may be unreliable, demonstrating no absence of association with intelligence. The use of embedded and hierarchical figures is recommended. The self-report questionnaire used in this study showed an unsatisfactory factor structure and also cannot be recommended without futher validation on independent samples. The findings also did not correspond with the original two-dimensional theory.
Links
GC19-09265J, research and development project |
| ||
MUNI/A/1323/2020, interní kód MU |
|