OSTADAL, Petr, Richard ROKYTA, Jiri KARASEK, Andreas KRUGER, Dagmar VONDRAKOVA, Marek JANOTKA, Jan NAAR, Jana SMALCOVA, Marketa HUBATOVA, Milan HROMADKA, Stefan VOLOVAR, Miroslava SEYFRYDOVA, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ, Michal SVOBODA, Ales LINHART and Jan BELOHLAVEK. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2023, vol. 147, No 6, p. 454-464. ISSN 0009-7322. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062949.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial
Authors OSTADAL, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Richard ROKYTA (203 Czech Republic), Jiri KARASEK (203 Czech Republic), Andreas KRUGER, Dagmar VONDRAKOVA (203 Czech Republic), Marek JANOTKA (203 Czech Republic), Jan NAAR (203 Czech Republic), Jana SMALCOVA (203 Czech Republic), Marketa HUBATOVA (203 Czech Republic), Milan HROMADKA (203 Czech Republic), Stefan VOLOVAR (203 Czech Republic), Miroslava SEYFRYDOVA (203 Czech Republic), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Michal SVOBODA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Ales LINHART (203 Czech Republic) and Jan BELOHLAVEK (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Circulation, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2023, 0009-7322.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 37.800 in 2022
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/23:00131021
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062949
UT WoS 000931323600004
Keywords in English clinical trial; shock; cardiogenic; therapy
Tags 14119612, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 21/6/2023 08:55.
Abstract
Background: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used for circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock, although the evidence supporting its use in this context remains insufficient. The ECMO-CS trial (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock) aimed to compare immediate implementation of VA-ECMO versus an initially conservative therapy (allowing downstream use of VA-ECMO) in patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock.Methods: This multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated, academic clinical trial included patients with either rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock. Patients were randomly assigned to immediate VA-ECMO or no immediate VA-ECMO. Other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed as per current standards of care. In the early conservative group, VA-ECMO could be used downstream in case of worsening hemodynamic status. The primary end point was the composite of death from any cause, resuscitated circulatory arrest, and implementation of another mechanical circulatory support device at 30 days.Results: A total of 122 patients were randomized; after excluding 5 patients because of the absence of informed consent, 117 subjects were included in the analysis, of whom 58 were randomized to immediate VA-ECMO and 59 to no immediate VA-ECMO. The composite primary end point occurred in 37 (63.8%) and 42 (71.2%) patients in the immediate VA-ECMO and the no early VA-ECMO groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.46-1.12]; P=0.21). VA-ECMO was used in 23 (39%) of no early VA-ECMO patients. The 30-day incidence of resuscitated cardiac arrest (10.3.% versus 13.6%; risk difference, -3.2 [95% CI, -15.0 to 8.5]), all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 47.5%; risk difference, 2.5 [95% CI, -15.6 to 20.7]), serious adverse events (60.3% versus 61.0%; risk difference, -0.7 [95% CI, -18.4 to 17.0]), sepsis, pneumonia, stroke, leg ischemia, and bleeding was not statistically different between the immediate VA-ECMO and the no immediate VA-ECMO groups.Conclusions: Immediate implementation of VA-ECMO in patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock did not improve clinical outcomes compared with an early conservative strategy that permitted downstream use of VA-ECMO in case of worsening hemodynamic status.Registration:URL: ; Unique identifier: NCT02301819.
PrintDisplayed: 20/7/2024 00:28