Detailed Information on Publication Record
2023
Please, Disregard Us: When a Minority of the European Court of Human Rights Declares its own Court to be Ultra Vires
BOBEK, Michal and David KOSAŘBasic information
Original name
Please, Disregard Us: When a Minority of the European Court of Human Rights Declares its own Court to be Ultra Vires
Authors
BOBEK, Michal (203 Czech Republic) and David KOSAŘ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
European Law Review, Sweet & Maxwell, 2023, 0307-5400
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.000 in 2022
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/23:00131103
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
UT WoS
001022164700003
Keywords in English
Administration of justice; Courts' powers and duties; European Court of Human Rights; Jurisprudence; Subsidiarity; Ultra vires
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 25/4/2024 17:21, prof. JUDr. David Kosař, Ph.D., LL.M., J. S. D.
Abstract
V originále
Even in the tumultuous European judicial landscape of today, it is somewhat unusual to see a minority of a court to declare its own court to be ultra vires and to instruct the losing respondent state to disregard the judgment of the majority. That is nonetheless exactly what happened, in such a sharp and explicit manner for the first time, before the European Court of Human Rights in Grosam v Czech Republic. This contribution captures the story of that extraordinary case. It starts by explaining national law and practice and mapping out the procedure that led to the judgment. It then critically examines the implications of the judgment, making three broader arguments. First, the majority in Grosam violated the principles of subsidiarity and acted indeed ultra vires. Second, it extended the understanding of judicial independence beyond any reasonable limits. In doing so, the judgment fosters an extreme vision of judicial insulation in the name of judicial independence, both at the stages of judicial appointments, but also by excluding any and all lay persons from participation in judicial decision-making. Third, Grosam exposes structural shortcomings of the internal functioning of the European Court of Human Rights. This article therefore closes with thoughts on potential institutional changes that could be contemplate
Links
101002660, interní kód MU |
|