BALÁŽ, Marek, Jiří BÚŘIL, Tereza JURKOVÁ, Eva KORIŤÁKOVÁ, Dušan HRABOVSKÝ, Jonáš KUNST, Petra BARTOVA and Jan CHRASTINA. Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring determines the final electrode position for pallidal stimulation in dystonia patients. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY. SWITZERLAND: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2023, vol. 10, May 2023, p. 1-11. ISSN 2296-875X. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1206721.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring determines the final electrode position for pallidal stimulation in dystonia patients
Authors BALÁŽ, Marek (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Jiří BÚŘIL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tereza JURKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Eva KORIŤÁKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Dušan HRABOVSKÝ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Jonáš KUNST (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petra BARTOVA (203 Czech Republic) and Jan CHRASTINA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, SWITZERLAND, FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2023, 2296-875X.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30212 Surgery
Country of publisher Switzerland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 1.800 in 2022
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1206721
UT WoS 000998908800001
Keywords in English deep brain stimulation; dystonia; globus pallidus internus; microrecordings; stereotaxy
Tags 14110127, 14110131, 14119612, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Eva Dubská, učo 77638. Changed: 23/1/2024 08:46.
Abstract
BackgroundBilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an effective treatment for refractory dystonia. Neuroradiological target and stimulation electrode trajectory planning with intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MER) and stimulation are used. With improving neuroradiological techniques, the need for MER is in dispute mainly because of the suspected risk of hemorrhage and the impact on clinical post DBS outcome.ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare the preplanned GPi electrode trajectories with final trajectories selected for electrode implantation after electrophysiological monitoring and to discuss the factors potentially responsible for differences between preplanned and final trajectories. Finally, the potential association between the final trajectory selected for electrode implantation and clinical outcome will be analyzed.MethodsForty patients underwent bilateral GPi DBS (right-sided implants first) for refractory dystonia. The relationship between preplanned and final trajectories (MicroDrive system) was correlated with patient (gender, age, dystonia type and duration) and surgery characteristics (anesthesia type, postoperative pneumocephalus) and clinical outcome measured using CGI (Clinical Global Impression parameter). The correlation between the preplanned and final trajectories together with CGI was compared between patients 1-20 and 21-40 for the learning curve effect.ResultsThe trajectory selected for definitive electrode implantation matched the preplanned trajectory in 72.5% and 70% on the right and left side respectively; 55% had bilateral definitive electrodes implanted along the preplanned trajectories. Statistical analysis did not confirm any of the studied factors as predictor of the difference between the preplanned and final trajectories. Also no association between CGI and final trajectory selected for electrode implantation in the right/left hemisphere has been proven. The percentages of final electrodes implanted along the preplanned trajectory (the correlation between anatomical planning and intraoperative electrophysiology results) did not differ between patients 1-20 and 21-40. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in CGI (clinical outcome) between patients 1-20 and 21-40.ConclusionThe final trajectory selected after electrophysiological study differed from the preplanned trajectory in a significant percentage of patients. No predictor of this difference was identified. The anatomo-electrophysiological difference was not predictive of the clinical outcome (as measured using CGI parameter).
Links
NV19-04-00343, research and development projectName: Predikce Efektu Stimulace u pacientů s Epilepsií (PRESEnCE) (Acronym: PRESEnCE)
Investor: Ministry of Health of the CR
PrintDisplayed: 3/5/2024 21:22