HURLEY, Rachel, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg BRAATEN, Luca NIZZETTO, Eirik Hovland STEINDAL, Yan LIN, Francois CLAYER, Tim VAN EMMERIK, Nina Tuscano BUENAVENTURA, David Petersen EIDSVOLL, Asle OKELSRUD, Magnus NORLING, Hans Nicolai ADAM and Marianne OLSEN. Measuring riverine macroplastic: Methods, harmonisation, and quality control. Water Research. OXFORD: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, 2023, vol. 235, May 2023, p. 1-14. ISSN 0043-1354. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119902.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Measuring riverine macroplastic: Methods, harmonisation, and quality control
Authors HURLEY, Rachel, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg BRAATEN, Luca NIZZETTO (380 Italy, belonging to the institution), Eirik Hovland STEINDAL, Yan LIN, Francois CLAYER, Tim VAN EMMERIK, Nina Tuscano BUENAVENTURA, David Petersen EIDSVOLL, Asle OKELSRUD, Magnus NORLING, Hans Nicolai ADAM and Marianne OLSEN.
Edition Water Research, OXFORD, PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, 2023, 0043-1354.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 10511 Environmental sciences
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 12.800 in 2022
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14310/23:00131497
Organization unit Faculty of Science
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119902
UT WoS 001030345200001
Keywords in English Plastic; Litter; River; Monitoring; Harmonisation
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Michaela Hylsová, Ph.D., učo 211937. Changed: 25/8/2023 11:02.
Abstract
River systems are a key environmental recipient of macroplastic pollution. Understanding the sources of mac-roplastic to rivers and the mechanisms controlling fate and transport is essential to identify and tailor measures that can effectively reduce global plastic pollution. Several guidelines exist for monitoring macroplastic in rivers; yet, no single method has emerged representing the standard approach. This reflects the substantial variability in river systems globally and the need to adapt methods to the local environmental context and monitoring goals. Here we present a critical review of methods used to measure macroplastic flows in rivers, with a specific focus on opportunities for methods testing, harmonisation, and quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC). Several studies have already revealed important findings; however, there is significant disparity in the reporting of methodologies and data. There is a need to converge methods, and their adaptations, towards greater compa-rability. This can be achieved through: i) methods testing to better understand what each method effectively measures and how it can be applied in different contexts; ii) incorporating QA/QC procedures during sampling and analysis; and iii) reporting methodological details and data in a more harmonised way to facilitate comparability and the utilisation of data by several end users, including policy makers. Setting this as a priority now will facilitate the collection of rigorous and comparable monitoring data to help frame solutions to limit plastic pollution, including the forthcoming global treaty on plastic pollution.
PrintDisplayed: 19/7/2024 01:26